Back

Individual differences in visual search performance extend from artificial arrays to naturalistic environments.

Botch, T. L.; Garcia, B. D.; Choi, Y. B.; Robertson, C. E.

2021-10-16 neuroscience
10.1101/2021.10.15.464609 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Visual search is a universal human activity in naturalistic environments. Traditionally, visual search is investigated under tightly controlled conditions, where head-restricted participants locate a minimalistic target in a cluttered array presented on a computer screen. Do classic findings of visual search extend to naturalistic settings, where participants actively explore complex, real-world scenes? Here, we leverage advances in virtual reality (VR) technology to relate individual differences in classic visual search paradigms to naturalistic search behavior. In a naturalistic visual search task, participants looked for an object within their environment via a combination of head-turns and eye-movements using a head-mounted display. Then, in a classic visual search task, participants searched for a target within a simple array of colored letters using only eye-movements. We tested how set size, a property known to limit visual search within computer displays, predicts the efficiency of search behavior inside immersive, real-world scenes that vary in levels of visual clutter. We found that participants search performance was impacted by the level of visual clutter within real-world scenes. Critically, we also observed that individual differences in vi1-3sual search efficiency in classic search predicted efficiency in real-world search, but only when the comparison was limited to the forward-facing field of view for real-world search. These results demonstrate that set size is a reliable predictor of individual performance across computer-based and active, real-world visual search behavior.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 1%
17.9%
2
Journal of Vision
92 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.8%
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 6%
6.1%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 30%
6.1%
5
Cognition
44 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
6
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
7
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.5%
8
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 22%
3.5%
9
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 28%
3.5%
10
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
11
Neuroscience of Consciousness
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
12
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
46 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
13
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
14
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
15
Consciousness and Cognition
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
16
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
17
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.6%
18
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.6%
19
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
20
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.6%
21
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
22
Behavior Research Methods
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
23
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
24
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
25
Human Movement Science
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
26
Psychological Science
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
27
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
29
Journal of Neurophysiology
263 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
30
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.6%