Back

MspA Porin as a Local Nanopore Probe for Membrane-bound Proteins

Hoogerheide, D. P.; Gurnev, P. A.; Gundlach, J.; Laszlo, A.; Rostovtseva, T. K.; Bezrukov, S. M.

2021-10-15 biophysics
10.1101/2021.10.15.464579 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Nanopore sensing is based on detection and analysis of nanopore transient conductance changes induced by analyte capture. We have recently shown that -Synuclein (Syn), an intrinsically disordered, membrane-active, neuronal protein implicated in Parkinson disease, can be reversibly captured by the VDAC nanopore. The capture process is a highly voltage dependent complexation of the two proteins where transmembrane potential drives the polyanionic C-terminal domain of Syn into VDAC--exactly the mechanism by which generic nanopore-based interrogation of proteins and polynucleotides proceeds. The complex formation, and the motion of Syn in the nanopore, thus may be expected to be only indirectly dependent on the pore identity. Here, we confirm this prediction by demonstrating that when VDAC is replaced with a different transmembrane pore, the engineered mycobacterial porin M2MspA, all the qualitative features of the Syn/nanopore interaction are preserved. The rate of Syn capture by M2MspA rises exponentially with the applied field, while the residence time displays a crossover behavior, indicating that at voltages >50 mV M2MspA-bound Syn largely undergoes translocation to the other side of the membrane. The translocation is directly confirmed using the selectivity tag method, in which the polyanionic C-terminal and neutral N-terminal regions of Syn alter the selectivity of the M2MspA channel differently, allowing direct discrimination of translocation vs retraction for single Syn molecules. We thus prove that the physical model of the motion of disordered protein chains in the nanopore confinement and the selectivity tag technique are not limited to VDAC but are broadly applicable to nanopore-based protein detection, analysis, and separation technologies.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.