Back

Integrating Subclonal Response Heterogeneity to Define Cancer Organoid Therapeutic Sensitivity

Kratz, J. D.; Rehman, S.; Johnson, K. A.; Gillette, A. A.; Sunil, A.; Favreau, P. F.; Pasch, C. A.; Miller, D.; Zarling, L. C.; Yeung, A. H.; Clipson, L.; Anderson, S. J.; DeZeeuw, A. K.; Sprackling, C. M.; Lemmon, K. K.; Abbott, D. E.; Burkard, M. E.; Bassetti, M. F.; Eickhoff, J. C.; Foley, E. F.; Heise, C. P.; Kimple, R. J.; Lawson, E. H.; LoConte, N. K.; Lubner, S. J.; Mulkerin, D. K.; Matkowskyj, K. A.; Sanger, C. B.; Uboha, N. V.; Mcilwain, S. J.; Ong, I. M.; Carchman, E. H.; Skala, M. C.; Deming, D. A.

2021-10-15 cancer biology
10.1101/2021.10.15.464556 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Tumor heterogeneity is predicted to confer inferior clinical outcomes, however modeling heterogeneity in a manner that still represents the tumor of origin remains a formidable challenge. Sequencing technologies are limited in their ability to identify rare subclonal populations and predict response to the multitude of available treatments for patients. Patient-derived organotypic cultures have significantly improved the modeling of cancer biology by faithfully representing the molecular features of primary malignant tissues. Patient-derived cancer organoid (PCO) cultures contain numerous individual organoids with the potential to recapitulate heterogeneity, though PCOs are most commonly studied in bulk ignoring any diversity in the molecular profile or treatment response. Here we demonstrate the advantage of evaluating individual PCOs in conjunction with cellular level optical metabolic imaging to characterize the largely ignored heterogeneity within these cultures to predict clinical therapeutic response, identify subclonal populations, and determine patient specific mechanisms of resistance.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.2%
2
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
10.4%
3
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.3%
4
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
5
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.3%
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.5%
7
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 15%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.0%
9
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.7%
10
Cancer Cell
38 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.7%
11
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
12
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
13
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 13%
2.1%
14
Cancer Discovery
61 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.9%
15
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.7%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.7%
17
Modern Pathology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
18
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
19
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
20
ACS Central Science
66 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
21
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 52%
0.9%
22
Laboratory Investigation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
23
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.9%
24
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
25
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.8%
26
Molecular Cancer
14 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
27
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
28
Nature Cancer
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
29
Neuro-Oncology
30 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
30
Lab on a Chip
88 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%