Back

Head and Neck Cancer Primary Tumor Auto Segmentation using Model Ensembling of Deep Learning in PET-CT Images

Naser, M. A.; Wahid, K. A.; van Dijk, L. V.; He, R.; Abdelaal, M. A.; Dede, C.; Mohamed, A. S. R.; Fuller, C. D.

2021-10-18 radiology and imaging
10.1101/2021.10.14.21264953 medRxiv
Show abstract

Auto-segmentation of primary tumors in oropharyngeal cancer using PET/CT images is an unmet need that has the potential to improve radiation oncology workflows. In this study, we develop a series of deep learning models based on a 3D Residual Unet (ResUnet) architecture that can segment oropharyngeal tumors with high performance as demonstrated through internal and external validation of large-scale datasets (training size = 224 patients, testing size = 101 patients) as part of the 2021 HECKTOR Challenge. Specifically, we leverage ResUNet models with either 256 or 512 bottleneck layer channels that are able to demonstrate internal validation (10-fold cross-validation) mean Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) up to 0.771 and median 95% Hausdorff distance (95% HD) as low as 2.919 mm. We employ label fusion ensemble approaches, including Simultaneous Truth and Performance Level Estimation (STAPLE) and a voxel-level threshold approach based on majority voting (AVERAGE), to generate consensus segmentations on the test data by combining the segmentations produced through different trained cross-validation models. We demonstrate that our best performing ensembling approach (256 channels AVERAGE) achieves a mean DSC of 0.770 and median 95% HD of 3.143 mm through independent external validation on the test set. Concordance of internal and external validation results suggests our models are robust and can generalize well to unseen PET/CT data. We advocate that ResUNet models coupled to label fusion ensembling approaches are promising candidates for PET/CT oropharyngeal primary tumors auto-segmentation, with future investigations targeting the ideal combination of channel combinations and label fusion strategies to maximize segmentation performance.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Medical Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
21.7%
2
Physics in Medicine & Biology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.6%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 11%
6.7%
4
Journal of Medical Imaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.1%
5
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.3%
6
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
41 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
7
European Radiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.4%
8
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
9
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 42%
2.4%
10
Medical Image Analysis
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
11
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
60 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.4%
12
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
13
Frontiers in Oncology
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
14
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
15
Neuro-Oncology Advances
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
16
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
17
npj Precision Oncology
53 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.5%
18
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 47%
1.5%
19
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
20
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
21
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
22
Sensors
43 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.1%
23
BMC Cancer
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
25
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.8%
26
Photoacoustics
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
27
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 36%
0.6%
28
Nature Machine Intelligence
70 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
29
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
22 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
30
Human Brain Mapping
329 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%