Back

Head and Neck Cancer Primary Tumor Auto Segmentation using Model Ensembling of Deep Learning in PET-CT Images

Naser, M. A.; Wahid, K. A.; van Dijk, L. V.; He, R.; Abdelaal, M. A.; Dede, C.; Mohamed, A. S. R.; Fuller, C. D.

2021-10-18 radiology and imaging
10.1101/2021.10.14.21264953
Show abstract

Auto-segmentation of primary tumors in oropharyngeal cancer using PET/CT images is an unmet need that has the potential to improve radiation oncology workflows. In this study, we develop a series of deep learning models based on a 3D Residual Unet (ResUnet) architecture that can segment oropharyngeal tumors with high performance as demonstrated through internal and external validation of large-scale datasets (training size = 224 patients, testing size = 101 patients) as part of the 2021 HECKTOR Challenge. Specifically, we leverage ResUNet models with either 256 or 512 bottleneck layer channels that are able to demonstrate internal validation (10-fold cross-validation) mean Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) up to 0.771 and median 95% Hausdorff distance (95% HD) as low as 2.919 mm. We employ label fusion ensemble approaches, including Simultaneous Truth and Performance Level Estimation (STAPLE) and a voxel-level threshold approach based on majority voting (AVERAGE), to generate consensus segmentations on the test data by combining the segmentations produced through different trained cross-validation models. We demonstrate that our best performing ensembling approach (256 channels AVERAGE) achieves a mean DSC of 0.770 and median 95% HD of 3.143 mm through independent external validation on the test set. Concordance of internal and external validation results suggests our models are robust and can generalize well to unseen PET/CT data. We advocate that ResUNet models coupled to label fusion ensembling approaches are promising candidates for PET/CT oropharyngeal primary tumors auto-segmentation, with future investigations targeting the ideal combination of channel combinations and label fusion strategies to maximize segmentation performance.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Radiotherapy and Oncology
based on 11 papers
Top 0.1%
22.3%
2
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 9%
12.5%
3
Neuro-Oncology Advances
based on 14 papers
Top 0.4%
7.1%
4
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 64%
5.9%
5
Clinical Cancer Research
based on 22 papers
Top 0.9%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
6
Scientific Data
based on 30 papers
Top 0.2%
5.0%
7
Frontiers in Oncology
based on 34 papers
Top 2%
3.3%
8
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 19%
3.1%
9
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
based on 14 papers
Top 1%
2.7%
10
npj Precision Oncology
based on 14 papers
Top 1%
2.7%
11
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
based on 13 papers
Top 1.0%
2.7%
12
European Radiology
based on 11 papers
Top 2%
1.8%
13
Computers in Biology and Medicine
based on 39 papers
Top 3%
1.8%
14
Cancers
based on 57 papers
Top 5%
1.8%
15
BMC Cancer
based on 21 papers
Top 3%
1.5%
16
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
based on 11 papers
Top 0.9%
1.5%
17
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
based on 14 papers
Top 2%
1.5%
18
npj Digital Medicine
based on 85 papers
Top 12%
0.9%
19
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 26%
0.9%
20
International Journal of Cancer
based on 18 papers
Top 2%
0.9%
21
Nature Medicine
based on 88 papers
Top 13%
0.9%
22
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
based on 11 papers
Top 2%
0.7%
23
NeuroImage
based on 36 papers
Top 4%
0.7%
24
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
based on 10 papers
Top 2%
0.7%