A high content microscopy-based platform for detecting antibodies to the nucleocapsid, spike and membrane proteins of SARS-CoV-2
Williams, D. M.; Hornsby, H.; Shehata, O. M.; Brown, R.; Zafred, D.; Shun-Shion, A. S. M.; Hodder, A. J.; Bliss, D.; Metcalfe, A.; Edgar, J.; Gordon, D. E.; Sayers, J. R.; Nicklin, M. J.; Collini, P. J.; Brown, S.; de Silva, T. I.; Peden, A. A.
Show abstract
The strong humoral immune response produced against the SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid (N) and spike (S) proteins has underpinned serological testing but the prevalence of antibody responses to other SARS-CoV-2 proteins, which may be of use as further serological markers, is still unclear. Cell-based serological screening platforms can fulfil a crucial niche in the identification of antibodies which recognise more complex folded epitopes or those incorporating post-translation modifications which may be undetectable by other methods used to investigate the antigenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 proteome. Here, we employed automated high content immunofluorescence microscopy (AHCIM) to assess the viability of such an approach as a method capable of assaying humoral immune responses against full length SARS-CoV-2 proteins in their native cellular state. We first demonstrate that AHCIM provides high sensitivity and specificity in the detection of SARS-CoV-2 N and S IgG. Assessing the prevalence of antibody responses to the SARS-CoV-2 structural membrane protein (M), we further find that 85% of COVID-19 patients within our sample set developed detectable M IgG responses (M sensitivity 85%, N sensitivity 93%, combined N + M sensitivity 95%). The identification of M as a serological marker of high prevalence may be of value in detecting additional COVID-19 cases during the era of mass SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations, where serological screening for SARS CoV-2 infections in vaccinated individuals is dependent on detection of antibodies against N. These findings highlight the advantages of using cell-based systems as serological screening platforms and raise the possibility of using M as a widespread serological marker alongside N and S.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Seasonal human coronavirus antibodies are boosted upon SARS-CoV-2 infection but not associated with protection 95%
- The Omicron variant is highly resistant against antibody-mediated neutralization - implications for control of the COVID-19 pandemic 94%
- COVID-19 neutralizing antibodies predict disease severity and survival 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Asymptomatic and symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections elicit polyfunctional antibodies 96%
- Serological Analysis Reveals an Imbalanced IgG Subclass Composition Associated with COVID-19 Disease Severity 94%
- Longitudinal analysis of humoral immunity against SARS-CoV-2 Spike in convalescent individuals up to 8 months post-symptom onset 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Seven-month kinetics of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies and protective role of pre-existing antibodies to seasonal human coronaviruses on COVID-19 94%
- Elevated mucosal antibody responses against SARS-CoV-2 are correlated with lower viral load and faster decrease in systemic COVID-19 symptoms 94%
- Shotgun Transcriptome and Isothermal Profiling of SARS-CoV-2 Infection Reveals Unique Host Responses, Viral Diversification, and Drug Interactions 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.