Back

Rare instances of non-random dropout with the monochrome multiplex qPCR assay for mitochondrial DNA copy number

Yang, S. Y.; Newcomb, C. E.; Battle, S. L.; Hsieh, A. Y.; Chapman, H. L.; Cote, H. C.; Arking, D. E.

2021-10-11 genetics
10.1101/2021.10.11.463983 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Mitochondrial DNA copy number (mtDNA-CN) is a proxy for mitochondrial function and has been of increasing interest to the mitochondrial research community. There are a number of ways to measure mtDNA-CN, ranging from qPCR to whole genome sequencing [1]. A recent article in the Journal of Molecular Diagnostics [2] described a novel method for measuring mtDNA-CN that is both inexpensive and reproducible. After adapting the assay for use in our lab, we have found it to be reproducible and well-correlated with mtDNA-CN derived from whole genome sequencing. However, certain individuals show poor concordance between the two measures, particularly individuals with qPCR mtDNA-CN measurements >3 standard deviations below the sample mean, which corresponds to roughly 1% of assayed individuals (Figure 1). After examining whole genome sequencing data, this seems to be due to specific polymorphisms within the D-loop primer region, at positions MT 338, 340, 452, 457, 458, 460, 461, 466, and 467. All individuals with a variant in at least one of these positions have non-concordant mtDNA-CN measurements. Meanwhile, variants observed at other positions within the primer region do not appear to cause dropout. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=113 SRC="FIGDIR/small/463983v1_fig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (16K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@134ca51org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@ce9196org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1b82af6org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@c9701_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG O_FLOATNOFigure 1.C_FLOATNO Discrepancy between the monochrome multiplex qPCR mtDNA-CN and the whole genome sequencing mtDNA-CN for 1,732 distinct individuals. Data are centered at 0 and scaled so that the standard deviation = 1. The dotted red line represents 3 standard deviations beneath the sample mean. Individuals in the U, L1, L4, and T haplogroups have a disproportionately higher risk of discordant measures between the two assays. C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Clinical Virology
62 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.5%
2
Forensic Science International: Genetics
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.5%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 24%
7.3%
4
BioTechniques
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
5
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
Mitochondrion
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
7
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.6%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.4%
9
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.9%
10
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
11
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
12
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
13
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
14
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
15
Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
16
BMC Research Notes
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
17
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
18
Biology Letters
66 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
19
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
20
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
21
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
22
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
23
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
24
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
26
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
27
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
28
Journal of Virological Methods
36 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
29
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
30
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%