A theoretical framework for proteome-scale single-molecule protein identification using multi-affinity protein binding reagents
Egertson, J. D.; DiPasquo, D.; Killeen, A.; Lobanov, V.; Patel, S.; Mallick, P.
Show abstract
The proteome is perhaps the most dynamic and valuable source of functional biological insight. Current proteomic techniques are limited in their sensitivity and throughput. A typical single experiment measures no more than 8% of the human proteome from blood or 35% from cells and tissues 1, 2. Here, we introduce a theoretical framework for a fundamentally different approach to proteomics that we call Protein Identification by Short-epitope Mapping (PrISM). PrISM utilizes multi-affinity reagents to target short linear epitopes with both a high affinity and low specificity. PrISM further employs a novel protein decoding algorithm that considers the stochasticity expected for single-molecule binding. In simulations, PrISM is able to identify more than 98% of proteins across the proteomes of a wide range of organisms. PrISM is robust to potential experimental confounders including false negative detection events and noise. Simulations of the approach with a chip containing 10 billion protein molecules show a dynamic range of 11.5 and 9.5 orders of magnitude for blood plasma and HeLa cells, respectively. If implemented experimentally, PrISM stands to rapidly quantify over 90% of the human proteome in a single experiment, potentially revolutionizing proteomics research.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Protein prediction models support widespread post-transcriptional regulation of protein abundance by interacting partners 94%
- STREAK: A Supervised Cell Surface Receptor Abundance Estimation Strategy for Single Cell RNA-Sequencing Data using Feature Selection and Thresholded Gene Set Scoring 94%
- Semi-supervised Bayesian integration of multiple spatial proteomics datasets 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.