Back

Effects of forest disturbance and regeneration on tree species composition and traits in DR Congo

Depecker, J.; Asimonyio, J. A.; Miteho, R.; Hatangi, Y.; Kambale, J.-L.; Verleysen, L.; Stoffelen, P.; Janssens, S.; Dhed'a, B.; Vandelook, F.; Honnay, O.

2021-10-12 ecology
10.1101/2021.10.11.463162 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Despite their key role in biodiversity conservation, forests of the Congo Basin are increasingly threatened by human activities. Whereas deforestation is very conspicuous, it remains challenging to monitor the impact of forest degradation under a more or less intact canopy. Likewise, the outcomes of forest regeneration following agricultural abandonment remain poorly studied in the Congo Basin. Here, we surveyed 125 vegetation quadrats across 25 forest inventory plots in the Yangambi region, and based on historical land-use maps. We aimed to assess both the impact of anthropogenic disturbance and forest recovery on tree species diversity, tree functional traits, community composition, canopy cover, and forest structure, as compared to undisturbed old-growth forest. We found that undisturbed old-growth forest harboured more tree individuals, particularly individuals with a smaller diameter, as well as species with a higher wood density when compared to both disturbed old-growth and regrowth forest. Moreover, species diversity was highest in disturbed old-growth forest. Tree species composition was significantly different between undisturbed old-growth forest and the other two forest categories. Our findings indicate that anthropogenic disturbance results in a degraded forest structure and may reduce the forests ability to store carbon. Whereas species diversity recovered 60 years after agricultural abandonment, species composition remained different from undisturbed old-growth forest. Our study illustrates the need for more extensive vegetation surveys in the Congo Basin in order to quantify the effects of human disturbance under a closed canopy.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Forest Ecology and Management
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.9%
2
Biotropica
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.6%
3
Ecological Indicators
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.9%
4
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
5
Biological Conservation
46 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.0%
6
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
4.0%
7
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
8
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.2%
9
Biodiversity and Conservation
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
10
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
11
Journal of Environmental Management
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
12
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
13
Journal of Ecology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
14
Insect Conservation and Diversity
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
15
Landscape Ecology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
16
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.7%
17
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
18
Global Change Biology
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
19
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
20
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
21
Frontiers in Plant Science
256 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
22
Animal Conservation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
23
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
24
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
25
Global Ecology and Biogeography
47 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
26
Ecology
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
Conservation Science and Practice
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
28
Basic and Applied Ecology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%