Back

A bias generating temporal distortions in serial perception

Sierra, F.; Poeppel, D.; Tavano, A.

2021-10-09 neuroscience
10.1101/2021.10.08.463190 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Precisely estimating event timing is essential for survival, yet temporal distortions are ubiquitous in our daily sensory experience. Here, we tested whether the relative position, relative duration and relative distance in time of two sequentially-organized events --standard S, with constant duration, and comparison C, varying trial-by-trial-- are causal factors in generating temporal distortions. We found that temporal distortions emerge when the first event is shorter than the second event. Importantly, a significant interaction suggests that a longer ISI helps counteracting such serial distortion effect only the constant S is in first position, but not if the unpredictable C is in first position. These results suggest the existence of a perceptual bias in perceiving ordered event durations, mechanistically contributing to distortion in time perception. We simulated our behavioral results with a Bayesian model and replicated the finding that participants disproportionately expand first-position dynamic (unpredictable) short events. Our results clarify the mechanics generating time distortions by identifying a hitherto unknown duration-dependent encoding inefficiency in human serial temporal perception, akin to a strong prior that can be overridden for highly predictable sensory events but unfolds for unpredictable ones.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.