Global Plant Extinction Risk Assessment Informs Novel Biodiversity Hotspots
Haevermans, T.; Tressou, J.; Kwon, J.; Pellens, R.; Dubearnes, A.; Veron, S.; Bel, L.; Dervaux, S.; Dibie-Barthelemy, J.; Gaudeul, M.; Govaerts, R.; Le Bras, G.; Muller, S.; Rouhan, G.; Sarthou, C.; Soler, L.
Show abstract
Curbing biodiversity loss and its impact on ecosystem services, resilience and Natures Contributions to People is one of the main challenges of our generation (IPBES, 2019b, 2019a; Secretariat of the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity, 2020). A global baseline assessment of the threat status of all of biodiversity is crucial to monitor the progress of conservation policies worldwide (Mace & al., 2000; Secretariat of the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity, 2021) and target priority areas for conservation (Walker & al., 2021). However, the magnitude of the task seems insurmountable, as even listing the organisms already known to science is a challenge (Nic Lughadha & al., 2016; Borsch & al., 2020; Govaerts & al., 2021). A new approach is needed to overcome this stumbling block and scale-up the assessment of extinction risk. Here we show that analyses of natural history mega-datasets using artificial intelligence allows us to predict a baseline conservation status for all vascular plants and identify target areas for conservation corresponding to hotspots optimally capturing different aspects of biodiversity. We illustrate the strong potential of AI-based methods to reliably predict extinction risk on a global scale. Our approach not only retrieved recognized biodiversity hotspots but identified new areas that may guide future global conservation action (Myers & al., 2000; Brooks & al., 2006). To further work in this area and guide the targets of the post-2020 biodiversity framework (Diaz & al., 2020a; Secretariat of the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity, 2020; Mair & al., 2021), it will be necessary to accelerate the acquisition of fundamental data and allow inclusion of social and economic factors (Possingham & Wilson, 2005).
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Hard-to-sample species are more sensitive to land-use change: implications for global biodiversity metrics 94%
- Megafauna diversity and functional declines in Europe from the Last Interglacial (LIG) to the present 94%
- Future climate and land use change will equally impact global terrestrial vertebrate diversity 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.