Back

General structure-free energy relationships of hERG blocker binding under native cellular conditions

Wan, H.; Spiru, K.; Williams, S.; Pearlstein, R. A.

2021-10-09 pharmacology and toxicology
10.1101/2021.10.07.463585 bioRxiv
Show abstract

We proposed previously that aqueous non-covalent barriers arise from solute-induced perturbation of the H-bond network of solvating water ("the solvation field") relative to bulk solvent, where the association barrier equates to enthalpic losses incurred from incomplete replacement of the H-bonds of expelled H-bond enriched solvation by inter-partner H-bonds, and the dissociation barrier equates to enthalpic + entropic losses incurred during dissociation-induced resolvation of H-bond depleted positions of the free partners (where dynamic occupancy is powered largely by the expulsion of such solvation to bulk solvent during association). We went on to analyze blockade of the human ether-a-go-go-related gene potassium channel (hERG) based on these principles, the results of which suggest that blockers: 1) project a single rod-shaped R-group (denoted as "BP") into the pore at a rate proportional to the desolvation cost of BP, with the largely solvated remainder (denoted as "BC") occupying the cytoplasmic "antechamber" of hERG; and 2) undergo second-order entry to the antechamber, followed by first-order association of BP to the pore. In this work, we used WATMD to qualitatively survey the solvation fields of the pore and a representative set of 16 blockers sampled from the Redfern dataset of marketed drugs spanning a range of pro-arrhythmicity. We show that the highly non-polar pore is solvated principally by H-bond depleted and bulk-like water (incurring zero desolvation cost), whereas blocker BP moieties are solvated by variable combinations of H-bond enriched and depleted water. With a few explainable exceptions, the blocker solvation fields (and implied desolvation/resolvation costs) are qualitatively well-correlated with both blocker potency and Redfern safety classification.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.