Comparison between Lotka-Volterra and Multivariate Autoregressive models of ecological interaction systems
Olivenca, D. V.; Davis, J. D.; Voit, E. O.
Show abstract
O_LILotka-Volterra (LV) and Multivariate Autoregressive (MAR) models are computational frameworks with different mathematical structures that have both been proposed for the same purpose of extracting governing features of dynamic interactions among coexisting populations of different species from observed time series data. C_LIO_LIWe systematically compare the feasibility of the two modeling approaches, using four synthetically generated datasets and seven ecological datasets from the literature. C_LIO_LIThe overarching result is that LV models outperform MAR models in most cases and are generally superior for representing cases where the dependent variables deviate greatly from their steady states. A large dynamic range is particularly prevalent when the populations are highly abundant, change considerably over time, and exhibit a large signal-to-noise ratio. By contrast, MAR models are better suited for analyses of populations with low abundances and for investigations where the quantification of noise is important. C_LIO_LIWe conclude that the choice of either one or the other modeling framework should be guided by the specific goals of the analysis and the dynamic features of the data. C_LI Availability of algorithms usedhttps://github.com/LBSA-VoitLab/Comparison-Between-LV-and-MAR-Models-of-Ecological-Interaction-Systems
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- CrossLabFit: A Novel Framework for Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Data Across Multiple Labs for Model Calibration 94%
- Why are different estimates of the effective reproductive number so different? A case study on COVID-19 in Germany 94%
- Scalable gradients enable Hamiltonian Monte Carlo sampling for phylodynamic inference under episodic birth-death-sampling models 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Modelling spatially autocorrelated detection probabilities in spatial capture-recapture using random effects 94%
- Individual-based modelling of shelled pteropods 94%
- Estimating the fundamental niche: accounting for the uneven availability of existing environmental conditions in the calibration area 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.