Coevolution of interacting proteins through non-contacting and non-specific mutations
Ding, D.; Green, A. G.; Wang, B.; Lite, T.-L. V.; Weinstein, E. N.; Marks, D. S.; Laub, M. T.
Show abstract
Proteins often accumulate neutral mutations that do not affect current functions1 but can profoundly influence future mutational possibilities and functions2-4. Understanding such hidden potential has major implications for protein design and evolutionary forecasting5-7, but has been limited by a lack of systematic efforts to identify potentiating mutations8,9. Here, through the comprehensive analysis of a bacterial toxin-antitoxin system, we identified all possible single substitutions in the toxin that enable it to tolerate otherwise interface-disrupting mutations in its antitoxin. Strikingly, the majority of enabling mutations in the toxin do not contact, and promote tolerance non-specifically to, many different antitoxin mutations, despite covariation in homologs occurring primarily between specific pairs of contacting residues across the interface. In addition, the enabling mutations we identified expand future mutational paths that both maintain old toxin-antitoxin interactions and form new ones. These non-specific mutations are missed by widely used covariation and machine learning methods10,11. Identifying such enabling mutations will be critical for ensuring continued binding of therapeutically relevant proteins, such as antibodies, aimed at evolving targets12-14.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Slowly evolving dopaminergic activity modulates the moment-to-moment probability of movement initiation. 98%
- High-resolution structures map the metal import pathway in an Nramp transporter 97%
- linc-mipep and linc-wrb encode micropeptides that regulate chromatin accessibility in vertebrate-specific neural cells 97%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.