Back

Male White-shouldered Fairywrens (Malurus alboscapulatus) elevate testosterone when courting females but not during territorial challenges

Boersma, J.; Jones, J. A.; Enbody, E. D.; Welklin, J. F.; Ketaloya, S.; Karubian, J.; Schwabl, H.

2021-10-07 animal behavior and cognition
10.1101/2021.10.06.463071 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Testosterone mediates suites of physical and behavioral traits across vertebrates, and circulation varies considerably across and within taxa. However, an understanding of the causal factors of variation in circulating testosterone has proven difficult despite decades of research. According to the challenge hypothesis, agonistic interactions between males immediately prior to the breeding season produce the highest levels of testosterone measured during this period. While many studies have provided support for this hypothesis, most species do not respond to male-male competition by elevating testosterone. As a result, a recent revision of the hypothesis ( challenge hypothesis 2.0) places male-female interactions as the primary cause of rapid elevations in testosterone circulation in male vertebrates. Here, we offer a test of both iterations of the challenge hypothesis in a tropical bird species. We first illustrate that male White-shouldered Fairywrens (Malurus alboscapulatus) differ by subspecies in plasma testosterone concentrations. Then we use a social network approach to find that males of the subspecies with higher testosterone are characterized by greater social interaction scores, including more time aggregating to perform sexual displays. Next, we use a controlled experiment to test whether males respond to simulated territorial intrusion or courtship interaction contexts by elevating testosterone. Males sampled during courtship had greater plasma testosterone both relative to flushed controls and males sampled during simulated intrusion. Ultimately, our results are consistent with challenge hypothesis 2.0, as males rapidly elevated testosterone following interactions with females, but not during territorial challenges.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Behavioral Ecology
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
21.6%
2
Animal Behaviour
73 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.8%
3
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.8%
50% of probability mass above
4
Journal of Animal Ecology
75 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.8%
5
Ethology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
6
Hormones and Behavior
45 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.1%
7
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.7%
8
Ibis
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
9
Evolution
225 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
10
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
11
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
12
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
13
The American Naturalist
125 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
14
Molecular Ecology
336 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
15
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
16
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.9%
17
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
18
Functional Ecology
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
19
Behavioural Processes
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
20
Animal Cognition
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
21
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
110 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
Integrative Organismal Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%