Attractor Decision Network with Selective Inhibition
Liu, P.-H.; Lo, C.-C.; Wu, K.-A.
Show abstract
The ability to decide swiftly and accurately in an urgent scenario is crucial for an organisms survival. The neural mechanisms underlying the perceptual decision and trade-off between speed and accuracy have been extensively studied in the past few decades. Among several theoretical models, the attractor neural network model has successfully captured both behavioral and neuronal data observed in many decision experiments. However, a recent experimental study revealed additional details that were not considered in the original attractor model. In particular, the study shows that the inhibitory neurons in the posterior parietal cortex of mice are as selective to decision making results as the excitatory neurons, whereas the previous attractor model assumes the inhibitory neurons to be unselective. In this study, we investigate the attractor model with selective inhibition (selective model), which can be considered as a general case of the previous attractor model (unselective model). Our model reproduces several behavioral and neurophysiological observations. To analyze the dynamics of the selective model, we reduce it and show that selectivity adds a time-varying component to the energy landscape. This time dependence of the energy landscape allows the selective model to integrate information carefully in initial stages, then quickly converge to an attractor once the choice is clear. This results in the selective model having a more efficient speed-accuracy trade-off that is unreachable by unselective models.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Oligodendrocyte-mediated Myelin Plasticity and its role in Neural Synchronization 97%
- Dynamic control of sequential retrieval speed in networks with heterogeneous learning rules 97%
- Beta oscillations and waves in motor cortex can be accounted for by the interplay of spatially-structured connectivity and fluctuating inputs 97%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.