Back

Pan-cancer organoid validation of tumor outlier chromosomal amplification events

Salahudeen, A. A.; Yuki, K.; Seoane, J.; Mah, A. T.; Smith, A. R.; Kolahi, K.; De la O, S. M.; Hart, D. J.; Ding, J.; Ma, Z.; Barkal, S. A.; Shukla, N. D.; Zhang, H. C.; Cantrell, M. A.; Batish, A.; Usui, T.; Root, D. E.; Hahn, W.; Curtis, C.; Kuo, C. J.

2021-10-06 cancer biology
10.1101/2021.10.05.463147 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Somatic copy number gains are pervasive in many cancer types, yet their roles in oncogenesis are often poorly explored. This lack of understanding is in part due to broad extensions of copy gains across cancer genomes spanning large chromosomal regions, obscuring causal driver loci. Here we employed a multi-tissue pan-organoid modeling approach to validate candidate oncogenic loci identified within pan-cancer TCGA data by the overlap of extreme copy number amplifications with extreme expression dysregulation for each gene. The candidate outlier loci nominated by this integrative computational analysis were functionally validated by infecting cancer type-specific barcoded full length cDNA lentiviral libraries into cognate minimally transformed human and mouse organoids bearing initial oncogenic mutations from esophagus, oral cavity, colon, stomach, pancreas and lung. Presumptive amplification oncogenes were identified by barcode enrichment as a proxy for increased proliferation. Iterative analysis validated DYRK2 at 12q15, encoding a serine-threonine kinase, as an amplified head and neck squamous carcinoma oncogene in p53-/- oral mucosal organoids. Similarly, FGF3, amplified at 11q13 in 41% of esophageal squamous carcinomas, was validated in p53-/- esophageal organoids in vitro and in vivo with pharmacologic inhibition by small molecule and soluble receptor FGFR antagonists. Our studies establish the feasibility of pan-organoid contextual modeling of pan-cancer candidate genomic drivers, enabling oncogene discovery and preclinical therapeutic modeling.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.