Back

Whale shark rhodopsin adapted to its vertically wide-ranging lifestyle

Yamaguchi, K.; Koyanagi, M.; Sato, K.; Terakita, A.; Kuraku, S.

2021-10-01 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2021.10.01.462724 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Spectral tuning of visual pigments often facilitates adaptation to new environments, and it is intriguing to study the visual ecology of pelagic sharks with expanded habitats. The whale shark, which dives into the deep sea of nearly 2,000 meters besides near-surface filter-feeding, was previously shown to possesses the blue-shifted rhodopsin (RHO). In this study, our spectroscopy of recombinant whale shark RHO mutants revealed the dominant effect of the novel spectral tuning amino acid site 94, which is implicated in congenital stationary night blindness of humans, accounting for the blue shift. Thermal decay profiling revealed the reduction of the thermal stability of whale shark RHO, as typically observed for cone opsins, which was experimentally shown to be achieved by the site 178, as well as 94. The results suggest that these two sites cooperatively enhance the visual capacity in both the deep sea and the sea surface, enabling exceptionally wide vertical migration of this species.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
eLife
● 5828 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
48.9%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Journal of Experimental Biology
● 259 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
11.4%
Similar papers in this journal
50% of probability mass above
3
Molecular Biology and Evolution
◐ 542 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.7%
Similar papers in this journal
4
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
● 2444 papers in training set
Top 14%
3.9%
Similar papers in this journal
5
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
○ 233 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
6
iScience
○ 1154 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.3%
Similar papers in this journal
7
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
● 393 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.3%
8
Genome Biology and Evolution
◐ 338 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
9
PLOS Biology
● 486 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.0%
10
Communications Biology
○ 993 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.7%
11
Current Biology
○ 665 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.6%
12
Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution
○ 22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
13
Protein Science
○ 246 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
14
BMC Biology
○ 265 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
15
Biology Open
● 156 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
16
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 75%
0.8%
17
Biology Letters
● 76 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
18
PLOS Genetics
● 862 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.8%
19
The Plant Cell
◐ 161 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
20
The Journal of Physiology
○ 150 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
21
Molecular Immunology
○ 14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
22
Ecology and Evolution
○ 267 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
23
The Journal of Neuroscience
● 1025 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.6%
24
Cell Reports
○ 1498 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.