Normalizing automatic spinal cord cross-sectional area measures
Bedard, S.; Cohen-Adad, J.
Show abstract
Spinal cord cross-sectional area (CSA) is a relevant biomarker to assess spinal cord atrophy in various neurodegenerative diseases. However, the considerable inter-subject variability among healthy participants currently limits its usage. Previous studies explored factors contributing to the variability, yet the normalization models were based on a relatively limited number of participants (typically < 300 participants), required manual intervention, and were not implemented in an open-access comprehensive analysis pipeline. Another limitation is related to the imprecise prediction of the spinal levels when using vertebral levels as a reference; a question never addressed before in the search for a normalization method. In this study we implemented a method to measure CSA automatically from a spatial reference based on the central nervous system (the pontomedullary junction, PMJ), we investigated various factors to explain variability, and we developed normalization strategies on a large cohort (N=804). Cervical spinal cord CSA was computed on T1w MRI scans for 804 participants from the UK Biobank database. In addition to computing cross-sectional at the C2-C3 vertebral disc, it was also measured at 64 mm caudal from the PMJ. The effect of various biological, demographic and anatomical factors was explored by computing Pearsons correlation coefficients. A stepwise linear regression found significant predictors; the coefficients of the best fit model were used to normalize CSA. The correlation between CSA measured at C2-C3 and using the PMJ was y = 0.98x + 1.78 (R2 = 0.97). The best normalization model included thalamus volume, brain volume, sex and interaction between brain volume and sex. With this model, the coefficient of variation went down from 10.09% (without normalization) to 8.59%, a reduction of 14.85%. In this study we identified factors explaining inter-subject variability of spinal cord CSA over a large cohort of participants, and developed a normalization model to reduce the variability. We implemented an approach, based on the PMJ, to measure CSA to overcome limitations associated with the vertebral reference. This approach warrants further validation, especially in longitudinal cohorts. The PMJ-based method and normalization models are readily available in the Spinal Cord Toolbox.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Characterization of the central sulcus pli-de-passage fronto-parietal moyen in > 1000 human brains 94%
- Performance of three freely available methods for extracting white matter hyperintensities: FreeSurfer, UBO Detector and BIANCA 93%
- A framework for evaluating correspondence between brain images using anatomical fiducials 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Body size interacts with the structure of the central nervous system: A multi-center in vivo neuroimaging study 94%
- Test-retest repeatability of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) measurements in the cervical cord 93%
- Automatic segmentation of spinal cord lesions in MS: A robust tool for axial T2-weighted MRI scans 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Females exhibit smaller volumes of brain activation and lower inter-subject variability during motor tasks 92%
- Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of muscle contraction in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy 92%
- Accurate sex prediction of cisgender and transgender individuals without brain size bias 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Topographic volume-standardization atlas of the human brain 94%
- Application of the Anatomical Fiducials Framework to a Clinical Dataset of Patients with Parkinsons Disease 93%
- The deep winding at the brain surface: replicating a historical report associating the 'bridged' central sulcus with the pli de passage fronto-parietal moyen 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Improved Inter-Subject Alignment of the Lumbosacral Cord for Group-Level In Vivo Gray and White Matter Assessments: A Scan-Rescan MRI Study at 3T 96%
- 3 versus 7 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging for parcellations of subcortical brain structures 93%
- Effects of Weather and Season on Human Brain Volume 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.