Back

Multivariate pattern analysis reveals location specific aftereffects of 10Hz motor cortex transcranial alternating current stimulation

Tzvi, E.; Alizadeh, J.; Schubert, C.; Classen, J.

2021-10-01 neuroscience
10.1101/2021.09.30.462549 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundTranscranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) may induce frequency-specific aftereffects on brain oscillations in the stimulated location, which could serve as evidence for region-specific neuroplasticity. Aftereffects of tACS on the motor system remain unknown. ObjectiveTo find evidence for aftereffects in short EEG segments following tACS to two critical nodes of the motor network, namely, left motor cortex (lMC) and right cerebellum (rCB). We hypothesized that aftereffects of lMC will be stronger in and around lMC compared to both active stimulation of rCB, as well as inactive ("sham") control conditions. MethodsTo this end, we employed multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA), and trained a classifier to distinguish between EEG signals following each of the three stimulation protocols. This method accounts for the multitude facets of the EEG signal and thus is more sensitive to subtle modulation of the EEG signal. ResultsEEG signals in both theta ({theta}, 4-8Hz) and alpha (, 8-13Hz) were better classified to lMC-tACS compared to rCB-tACS/sham, in and around lMC-tACS stimulation locations (electrodes FC3 and CP3). This effect was associated with a decrease in power following tACS. Source reconstruction revealed significant differences in premotor cortex but not in primary motor cortex as the computational model suggested. Correlation between classification accuracies in {theta} and in lMC-tACS was stronger compared to rCB-tACS/sham, suggesting cross-frequency effects of tACS. Nonetheless, {theta}/ phase-coupling did not differ between stimulation protocols. ConclusionsSuccessful classification of EEG signals to left motor cortex using MVPA revealed focal tACS aftereffects on the motor cortex, indicative of region-specific neuroplasticity.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.