A hymenopteran odorant alerts flies to bury eggs
Davis, S. M.; Chism, G. T.; Maurer, M. M.; Trejo, J. E.; Garcia, R. J.; Schlenke, T. A.
Show abstract
Ants are ubiquitous and consume insects at all life stages, presumably creating a strong selective pressure for ant avoidance behaviors across insects. The insect egg stage can be especially defenseless against predation given that eggs are usually immobile and unguarded, suggesting insect mothers may have evolved oviposition strategies to minimize the ant predation risk to their offspring. Given the lack of parental care in most insects, these oviposition strategies would likely be innate rather than learned, since insect mothers are not usually present to assess predation of their eggs. Here, we use the vinegar fly Drosophila melanogaster as a model system for examining parental defensive responses to ant presence. Flies usually lay eggs partially inserted into the food substrate, although some are laid on top of the food and a few are inserted deeply into the food. We found that exposure to ants significantly alters fly oviposition depth: the proportion of eggs on the food surface decreased while the proportion of buried eggs increased. Buried eggs survive ant foraging bouts better than surface eggs, showing that this oviposition depth behavior is adaptive. This induced behavior is conserved across the genus Drosophila and is dependent on the fly olfactory system: anosmic mutant flies fail to bury their eggs in the presence of ants, and ant odor extracts are sufficient to induce egg burying. To further delineate the ant lineages to which flies respond, we exposed flies to the odors from numerous species of ants and other insects. Surprisingly, flies buried their eggs in response to the odors of nearly all hymenopterans tested, including hymenopteran groups that flies rarely interact with in nature like bees and paper wasps. Our data suggest that hymenopterans possess a conserved and ancient odorant, and that drosophilids evolved a mechanism for sensing this odorant early in their evolution as a means of protecting their offspring from ant predation. This study sheds light on the ecology and mechanisms underlying a sscommon biotic interaction in nature, that between insect parents ands the ants that would consume their offspring.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Behavior choices amongst grooming, feeding, and courting in Drosophila show contextual flexibility, not an absolute hierarchy of needs 97%
- Social foraging extends associative odor-food memory expression in an automated learning assay for Drosophila melanogaster 96%
- Canopy parkour: movement ecology of post-hatch dispersal in a gliding nymphal stick insect (Extatosoma tiaratum) 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Neural mechanisms of parasite-induced summiting behavior in 'zombie' Drosophila 95%
- The neuropeptide sulfakinin is a peripheral regulator of insect behavioral switch between mating and foraging 95%
- Individual differences in honey bee behavior enabled by plasticity in brain gene regulatory networks 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Drosophila's sensory responses to bacterial peptidoglycan integrates positive and negative signals 95%
- Thermal boldness: Volunteer exploration of extreme temperatures in Drosophila melanogaster 94%
- Warm periods in repeated cold stresses protect Drosophila against ionoregulatory collapse, chilling injury, and reproductive deficits 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.