Back

Is the impact of adiposity on taste perceptions moderated by chronic physical activity? An overview of the data from NHANES 2013-2014.

Gauthier, A.-C.; Mathieu, M.-E.

2021-10-01 sports medicine
10.1101/2021.09.30.21264372 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionTaste is a key sensory modulator of eating behaviour and thus energy intake. The effects of acute exercise has recently been confirmed especially regarding sweet and salty tastes. Physical activity is a safe and effective countermeasure to certain types of chemosensory losses, especially in older populations. Knowing that taste can be impaired with increased adiposity, it is unknown if the adoption of an active lifestyle on a regular basis can mitigate such impairments. MethodsData were extracted from NHANES 2013-2014 database. Perception of salt and bitter tastes for Tongue Tip Test and Whole Mouth Test, physical activity levels over an 8-9-day period and adiposity were analyzed. Moderation analyses were used to study the impact of adiposity on taste perceptions, with physical activity level as the moderator. ResultsThe 197 participants (130 males) included in this project had a mean{+/-}standard deviation age of 49.1{+/-}5.2 years, a mean body fat percentage of 31.7{+/-}7.6% and mean daily physical activity levels of 11 084{+/-}3531 Monitor-Independent Movement Summary unit (MIMS). The positive association between adiposity and both bitter Tongue Tip Test and overall result (salt+bitter) of Tongue Tip Test were moderated by the adoption of an active lifestyle, with better taste scores observed in individuals achieving higher physical activity levels. When moderation analysis were stratified by gender, the effect of physical activity was no longer significant. PerspectivesThis study is the first to evaluate the influence of an active lifestyle on the preservation of some taste perceptions across a wide range of adiposity levels. While differences in taste can be observed regarding body fat percentage, physical activity moderates that relation only when men and women are analysed together.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Physiology & Behavior
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.6%
2
Appetite
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.0%
3
Frontiers in Psychology
56 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.2%
50% of probability mass above
4
Nutrients
67 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.5%
5
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 24%
6.9%
6
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
128 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.3%
7
Experimental Gerontology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
8
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 39%
2.7%
9
Cureus
68 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
10
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
77 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.0%
11
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
12
Brain and Behavior
43 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
13
European Journal of Applied Physiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
14
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
15
Frontiers in Nutrition
24 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
16
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
17
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
18
Public Health Nutrition
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
19
Frontiers in Pediatrics
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
20
Physiological Reports
40 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
21
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%