Actions for fostering cross-disciplinary global health research
Ding, Y.; Tomeny, E.; Bates, I.; the IMPALA Consortium,
Show abstract
IntroductionThe ability to conduct cross-disciplinary research in international collaborations is critical for improving global health. Published evidence on actions to foster cross-disciplinary research comes mainly from high-income countries with its applicability to global health unclear. Our study investigated the actions taken to foster cross-disciplinary research across a North-South global health programme to recommend actions to improve the effectiveness of future cross-disciplinary research programmes in global health. MethodsWe used an adapted three-component framework to frame data collection and analyses. Building on a recent literature review, we compared actions used by the programme for planning, implementing and managing cross-disciplinary research to those described in the literature. Data sources included interviews with 31 participants (including researchers, administrators, and collaborators), a review of programme documents, a baseline survey, and observations of interactions at meetings and events. Interview data were coded and analysed using the framework. Narrative summaries were created using thematic synthesis and triangulated by the document review and observations. ResultsFor cross-disciplinary research to be successful in global health, a shared vision with explicit goals is essential. These goals concern knowledge integration supported by regular communication, orientation about involved disciplines, and equitable partnerships across institutions and individuals. Fostering cross-disciplinary global health research needs a significant time investment from researchers, support staff, and programme leaders. Indicators for tracking cross-disciplinary working should be agreed at the outset and monitored throughout. ConclusionCross-disciplinary activities should be managed separately from primary research activities. The three-component framework would be helpful in guiding designing cross-disciplinary programmes. Summary BoxO_ST_ABSWhat is already known?C_ST_ABSO_LIGlobal health can be advanced by cross-disciplinary collaboration within and beyond the health sciences. C_LIO_LIIndividual researchers, research team leaders, academic institutions and research funders all have roles in making cross-disciplinary research more effective. C_LIO_LIPublished evidence on actions to foster cross-disciplinary research comes mainly from high-income countries and its applicability to global health is unclear. C_LI What are the new findings?O_LIThe cross-disciplinary aspects of research programmes need to be actively managed. C_LIO_LIPre-agreed indicators should be used to plan and track cross-disciplinary research. C_LIO_LIFostering cross-disciplinary research and managing tensions takes time and explicit continuous discussions. C_LIO_LIOur adapted three-component framework (i.e., planning, implementation and management) is useful for collecting and analysing multi-source and multi-perspective data on a cross-disciplinary programme in real-time. C_LI What do the new findings imply?O_LICross-disciplinary activities should be managed and tracked separately from the primary research activities. C_LIO_LIProgress in research planning, implementation, and management should be reviewed against pre-agreed indicators, with troubleshooting conducted accordingly. C_LIO_LICross-disciplinary research requires the allocation of more time and funds for active management of research planning than would be required for mono-disciplinary projects. C_LIO_LIThe three-component framework would be helpful in guiding the design of cross-disciplinary programmes. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Influences on policy-formulation, decision-making, organisation and management for maternal, newborn and child health in Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Malawi and Uganda: the roles and legitimacy of a multi-country network 97%
- “We are their eyes and ears here on the ground, yet they do not appreciate us” - Factors influencing the performance of Kenyan community health volunteers working in urban informal settlements 97%
- An emerging TIMER-2C framework for addressing barriers to research culture and productivity among local healthcare providers in the Middle East and sub-Saharan Africa: a qualitative study and modified Delphi approach 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Leadership and Governance, Financing, and Coordination and their Impact on the Operationalization of Health Interventions in the Humanitarian-Development Nexus in South Sudan 96%
- Protocol For The Development Of A Core Outcome Set For Respectful Maternal And Newborn Care In A Low-Middle Income Setting 96%
- Strengthening health service delivery and governance through institutionalizing ‘Urban Health Atlas’ - a geo-referenced Information Communication and Technology tool: lessons learned from an implementation research in three cities in Bangladesh 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Lessons Learned From COVID-19 Modelling Efforts For Policy Decision-Making In Lower- And Middle-Income Countries 96%
- Use of Interviewer-Administered Telephone Surveys during Infectious Disease Outbreaks, Epidemics, and Pandemics: A Scoping Review 95%
- The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on health service utilisation in Sierra Leone 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- How can rural community-engaged health services planning affect sustainable health care system changes? - A process description and qualitative analysis of data from the Rural Coordination Centre of British Columbia’s Rural Site Visits Project 95%
- Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Utilization of Facility-Based Essential Maternal and Child Health Services in North Shewa Zone, Ethiopia 94%
- Challenges and facilitators in pathways to cancer diagnosis in Southern Africa: A qualitative study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Understanding Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices on Ebola Virus Disease: A Multi-Site Mixed Methods Survey on Preparedness in Rwanda 95%
- Acceptability and feasibility of strategies to shield the vulnerable during the COVID-19 outbreak: a qualitative study in six Sudanese communities 94%
- Community Perceptions of Vaccination Among Influential Stakeholders: Qualitative Research in Rural India 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.