The European Prevention of Alzheimer's Dementia (EPAD) MRI Dataset and Processing Workflow
Lorenzini, L.; Ingala, S.; Wink, A. M.; Kuijer, J.; Wottschel, V.; Dijsselhof, M.; Sudre, C.; Haller, S.; Molinuevo, J. L.; Gispert, J. D.; Cash, D. M.; Thomas, D. L.; Vos, S. B.; Prados, F.; Petr, J.; Wolz, R.; Palombit, A.; Schwarz, A.; Chetelat, G.; Payoux, P.; Di perri, C.; Wardlaw, J.; Frisoni, G. B.; Foley, C.; Fox, N. C.; Ritchie, C.; Pernet, C.; Waldman, A.; Barkhof, F.; Mutsaerts, H. J.
Show abstract
The European Prevention of Alzheimer Dementia (EPAD) is a multi-center study that aims to characterize the preclinical and prodromal stages of Alzheimers Disease. The EPAD imaging dataset includes core (3D T1w, 3D FLAIR) and advanced (ASL, diffusion MRI, and resting-state fMRI) MRI sequences. Here, we give an overview of the semi-automatic multimodal and multisite pipeline that we developed to curate, preprocess, quality control (QC), and compute image-derived phenotypes (IDPs) from the EPAD MRI dataset. This pipeline harmonizes DICOM data structure across sites and performs standardized MRI preprocessing steps. A semi-automated MRI QC procedure was implemented to visualize and flag MRI images next to site-specific distributions of QC features -- i.e. metrics that represent image quality. The value of each of these QC features was evaluated through comparison with visual assessment and step-wise parameter selection based on logistic regression. IDPs were computed from 5 different MRI modalities and their sanity and potential clinical relevance were ascertained by assessing their relationship with biological markers of aging and dementia. The EPAD v1500.0 data release encompassed core structural scans from 1356 participants 842 fMRI, 831 dMRI, and 858 ASL scans. From 1356 3D T1w images, we identified 17 images with poor quality and 61 with moderate quality. Five QC features -- Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR), Contrast to Noise Ratio (CNR), Coefficient of Joint Variation (CJV), Foreground-Background energy Ratio (FBER), and Image Quality Rate (IQR) -- were selected as the most informative on image quality by comparison with visual assessment. The multimodal IDPs showed greater impairment in associations with age and dementia biomarkers, demonstrating the potential of the dataset for future clinical analyses.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Reliability Assessment of Tissue Classification Algorithms for Multi-Center and Multi-Scanner Data 97%
- Quality control strategies for brain MRI segmentation and parcellation: practical approaches and recommendations - insights from The Maastricht Study 97%
- Effects of MP2RAGE B1+ sensitivity on inter-site T1 reproducibility and morphometry at 7T 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- PhiPipe: a multi-modal MRI data processing pipeline with test-retest reliability and predicative validity assessments 98%
- Comparison of structural MRI brain measures between 1.5T and 3T: data from the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936 97%
- The impact of multiband and in-plane acceleration on white matter microstructure analysis 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- A resource for development and comparison of multi-modal brain 3T MRI harmonisation approaches 97%
- Normative trajectories of R1, R2* and magnetic susceptibility in basal ganglia on healthy ageing 97%
- Fast and reliable quantitative measures of white matter development with magnetic resonance fingerprinting 97%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.