Back

In silico screening of TMPRSS2 SNPs that affect its binding with SARS-CoV2 spike protein and directly involved in the interaction affinity changes

Nouira, F.; Hamdi, M.; Redissi, A.; Kouidhi, S.; Charfeddine, C.; Msaad, M.; Cherif, A.; Messaoud, S.; Aldulaijan, S.; Raouafi, N.; Dhouib, A.; Mosbah, A.

2021-09-29 bioinformatics
10.1101/2021.09.29.462283 bioRxiv
Show abstract

In this paper, we used in silico analysis to shed light on the possible interaction between TMPRSS2 and SARS-CoV2 spike (S) protein by examining the role of TMPRSS2 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in relation with susceptibility and inter-individual variability of SARS-CoV2 infection. First, we used molecular docking of human TMPRSS2 protein to predict the binding site of TMPRSS2, especially the TMPRSS2 link loops, in order to assess the effect TMPRSS2 SNPs. The latter lead to missense variants on the interaction between TMPRSS2 and SARS-CoV2 S protein. In a second step, we further refine our analysis by performing a structure-function analysis of the complexes using PyMol software, and finally by MD simulations to validate the as-obtained results. Our findings show that 17 SNPs among the 692 natural TMPRSS2 coding variants are in positions to influence the binding of TMPRSS2 with the viral S protein. All of them give more important interaction energy as assessed by docking. Among the 17 SNPs, four missense variants E389A, K392Q, T393S and Q438E lead to "directly increasing" the interaction affinity and 2 missense variants R470I and Y416C cause it "directly decreasing". The R470I and Y416C present in African and American population, respectively. While the other 4 SNP variants (E389A; K392Q; T393S and Q438E) are present only in the European population, which could link the viral infection susceptibility to demographic, geographic and genetic factors.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
45.7%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.2%
3
Computational Biology and Chemistry
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
50% of probability mass above
4
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
84 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.4%
5
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.4%
6
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.4%
7
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
8
Gene Reports
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
9
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
102 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.0%
10
Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
11
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
12
Journal of Medical Virology
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
14
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
76 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
15
Bioscience Reports
27 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
16
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
17
Journal of Biosciences
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
18
Gene
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
19
Journal of Cellular Biochemistry
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
20
Virologica Sinica
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
21
Virology
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
22
Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports
30 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
23
Genes
144 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
24
Viruses
332 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
25
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
26
Infection, Genetics and Evolution
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
27
F1000Research
88 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
28
Frontiers in Pharmacology
111 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
29
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
22 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%