SVAT: Secure Outsourcing of Variant Annotation and Genotype Aggregation
Kim, M.; Wang, S.; Jiang, X.; Harmanci, A. O.
Show abstract
BackgroundSequencing of thousands of samples provides genetic variants with allele frequencies spanning a very large spectrum and gives invaluable insight for genetic determinants of diseases. Protecting the genetic privacy of participants is challenging as only a few rare variants can easily re-identify an individual among millions. In certain cases, there are policy barriers against sharing genetic data from indigenous populations and stigmatizing conditions. ResultsWe present SVAT, a method for secure outsourcing of variant annotation and aggregation, which are two basic steps in variant interpretation and detection of causal variants. SVAT uses homomorphic encryption to encrypt the data at the client-side. The data always stays encrypted while it is stored, in-transit, and most importantly while it is analyzed. SVAT makes use of a vectorized data representation to convert annotation and aggregation into efficient vectorized operations in a single framework. Also, SVAT utilizes a secure re-encryption approach so that multiple disparate genotype datasets can be combined for federated aggregation and secure computation of allele frequencies on the aggregated dataset. ConclusionsOverall, SVAT provides a secure, flexible, and practical framework for privacy-aware outsourcing of annotation, filtering, and aggregation of genetic variants. SVAT is publicly available for download from https://github.com/harmancilab/SVAT
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Freddie: Annotation-independent Detection and Discovery of Transcriptomic Alternative Splicing Isoforms 95%
- Accurate assembly of minority viral haplotypes from next-generation sequencing through efficient noise reduction 95%
- Echtvar: Compressed variant representation for rapid annotation and filtering of SNPs and indels 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.