Face masks impair reconstruction of acoustic speech features and higher-level segmentational features in the presence of a distractor speaker

Multisensory integration enables stimulus representation even when the sensory input in a single modality is weak. In the context of speech, when confronted with a degraded acoustic signal, congruent visual inputs promote comprehension. When this input is occluded speech comprehension consequently becomes more difficult. But it still remains inconclusive which levels of speech processing are affected under which circumstances by occlusion of the mouth area. To answer this question, we conducted an audiovisual (AV) multi-speaker experiment using naturalistic speech. In half of the trials, the target speaker wore a (surgical) face mask, while we measured the brain activity of normal hearing participants via magnetoencephalography (MEG). We additionally added a distractor speaker in half of the trials in order to create an ecologic difficult listening situation. A decoding model on the clear AV speech was trained and used to reconstruct crucial speech features in each condition. We found significant main effects of face masks on the reconstruction of acoustic features, such as the speech envelope and spectral speech features (i.e. pitch and formant frequencies), while reconstruction of higher level features of speech segmentation (phoneme and word onsets) were especially impaired through masks in difficult listening situations. As we used surgical face masks in our study, which only show mild effects on speech acoustics, we interpret our findings as the result of the occluded lip movements. This idea is in line with recent research showing that visual cortical regions track spectral modulations. Our findings extend previous behavioural results, by demonstrating the complex contextual effects of occluding relevant visual information on speech processing. HighlightsO_LISurgical face masks impair neural tracking of speech features C_LIO_LITracking of acoustic features is generally impaired, while higher level segmentational features show their effects especially in challenging listening situations C_LIO_LIAn explanation is the prevention of a visuo-phonological transformation contributing to audiovisual multisensory integration C_LI