Back

Nanopore sequencing methods detect cell-free DNA associated with minimal residual disease and central nervous system infiltration in pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Sampathi, S.; Chernyavskaya, Y.; Haney, M.; Moore, L. H.; Snyder, I.; Cox, A.; Taylor, T.; Fuller, B.; Badgett, T.; Blackburn, J.

2021-09-28 cancer biology
10.1101/2021.09.27.462067 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) patients that are positive for minimal residual disease (MRD) after therapy or have leukemic infiltration into the central nervous system (CNS) are considered high risk and receive intensive chemotherapy regimens. Current methods to diagnose MRD and CNS infiltration rely on detecting leukemic cells in patient samples using pathology, flow cytometry, or next-generation sequencing. However, leukemic blasts may persist in the patient but not be physically present in bone marrow biopsy or biofluid sample, leading to inaccurate or delayed patient diagnosis. We have developed a nanopore sequencing workflow to detect B-ALL-associated cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples. Quantitation of B-cell specific VDJ recombination events in cfDNA samples defined B-ALL clonal heterogeneity. This workflow allowed us to track the response of individual B-ALL clones throughout treatment. Detection of cfDNA also predicted the clinical diagnosis of MRD and CNS disease. Importantly, we identified patients diagnosed as CNS negative who had low B-cell derived cell-free DNA levels in their CSF sample that correlated with B-cell clones present in the bone marrow. These data suggest that cfDNA assays may be useful in detecting the presence of ALL in the patient even when blasts are not in the biofluid sample. Nanopore analysis of cell-free DNA is a simple, rapid, and inexpensive assay that can serve as a valuable complement to traditional clinical diagnostic approaches for ALL. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=50 SRC="FIGDIR/small/462067v2_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (12K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1373bd3org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@138b2e3org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@168661forg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1088626_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.