Distinct neural representations for prosocial and self-benefitting effort
Lockwood, P.; Wittmann, M.; Nili, H.; Matsumoto-Ryan, M.; Abdurahman, A.; Cutler, J.; Husain, M.; Apps, M.
Show abstract
Prosocial behaviours - actions that benefit others - are central to individual and societal well-being. Most prosocial acts are effortful. Yet, how the brain encodes effort costs when actions benefit others is unknown. Here, using a combination of multivariate representational similarity analysis and model-based univariate analysis during fMRI, we reveal how the costs of prosocial efforts are processed. Strikingly, we identified a unique neural signature of effort in the anterior cingulate gyrus for prosocial acts both when choosing to help others and when exerting force for their benefit. This pattern was absent for similar self-benefitting behaviour and correlated with individual levels of empathy. In contrast, the ventral tegmental area and the ventral insula signalled subjective value preferentially when choosing whether to exert effort to benefit oneself. These findings demonstrate partially distinct brain areas guide the evaluation and exertion of effort costs when acts are prosocial or self-benefitting.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Human hippocampus and dorsomedial prefrontal cortex infer and update latent causes during social interaction 98%
- Behavioral, physiological, and neural signatures of surprise during naturalistic sports viewing 97%
- Neuro-computational account of arbitration between imitation and emulation during human observational learning 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evidence accumulation, not "self-control," explains dorsolateral prefrontal activationduring normative choice 96%
- Omissions of Threat Trigger Subjective Relief and Prediction Error-Like Signaling in the Human Reward and Salience Systems 96%
- Reconfigurations of cortical manifold structure during reward-based motor learning 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.