Back

The Report on China-Spain Joint Clinical Testing for Rapid COVID-19 Risk Screening by Eye-region Manifestations

Fu, Y.; Li, F.; Fustel, P. b.; Zhao, L.; Jia, L.; Zheng, H.; Sun, Q.; Rong, S.; Tang, H.; Xue, X.; Yang, L.; Li, H.; Xie, J.; Wang, W.; Li, Y.; Wang, W.; Pei, Y.; Wang, J.; Wu, X.; Zheng, Y.; Tian, H.; Gu, M.

2021-09-27 ophthalmology
10.1101/2021.09.24.21263766 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe worldwide surge in coronavirus cases has led to the COVID-19 testing demand surge. Rapid, accurate, and cost-effective COVID-19 screening tests working at a population level are in imperative demand globally. MethodsBased on the eye symptoms of COVID-19, we developed and tested a COVID-19 rapid prescreening model using the eye-region images captured in China and Spain with cellphone cameras. The convolutional neural networks (CNNs)-based model was trained on these eye images to complete binary classification task of identifying the COVID-19 cases. The performance was measured using area under receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and F1. The application programming interface was open access. FindingsThe multicenter study included 2436 pictures corresponding to 657 subjects (155 COVID-19 infection, 23{middle dot}6%) in development dataset (train and validation) and 2138 pictures corresponding to 478 subjects (64 COVID-19 infections, 13{middle dot}4%) in test dataset. The image-level performance of COVID-19 prescreening model in the China-Spain multicenter study achieved an AUC of 0{middle dot}913 (95% CI, 0{middle dot}898-0{middle dot}927), with a sensitivity of 0{middle dot}695 (95% CI, 0{middle dot}643-0{middle dot}748), a specificity of 0{middle dot}904 (95% CI, 0{middle dot}891-0{middle dot}919), an accuracy of 0{middle dot}875(0{middle dot}861-0{middle dot}889), and a F1 of 0{middle dot}611(0{middle dot}568-0{middle dot}655). InterpretationThe CNN-based model for COVID-19 rapid prescreening has reliable specificity and sensitivity. This system provides a low-cost, fully self-performed, non-invasive, real-time feedback solution for continuous surveillance and large-scale rapid prescreening for COVID-19. FundingThis project is supported by Aimomics (Shanghai) Intelligent

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
40.8%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 17%
10.5%
50% of probability mass above
3
Annals of Translational Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
4
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
5
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 49%
2.2%
7
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
8
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
9
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
10
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
11
JMIR Medical Informatics
17 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
12
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
13
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.0%
14
British Journal of Ophthalmology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
15
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
16
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
17
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
18
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
19
JAMA
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
20
The Innovation
12 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
21
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
24
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
25
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
26
Infection
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
27
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
28
BMC Medical Research Methodology
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
29
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
30
Eye
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%