Back

Real-Time Semi-Automated and Automated Voxel Placement for Repeated Acquisition Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy

Bishop, J.; Geoly, A.; Khan, N.; Tischler, C.; Krueger, R.; Amin, H.; Baltusis, L.; Wu, H.; Spiegel, D.; Williams, N.; Sacchet, M.

2021-09-26 radiology and imaging
10.1101/2021.09.23.21264046 medRxiv
Show abstract

Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) is heavily dependent on the investigative team to prescribe, or demarcate, the desired tissue volume-of-interest. Manual prescription, the current standard in the field, requires expertise in neuroanatomy to ensure spatial consistency within and across subjects. Spatial precision of MRS voxel placement thus presents challenges for cross-sectional studies, and even more so for repeated-measure and multi-acquisition designs. Furthermore, voxel prescriptions based-solely on anatomical landmarks may not be ideal in regions with substantial functional and cytoarchitectural variability or to examine individualized/targeted interventions. Here we propose and validate robust and real-time methods to automate MRS voxel placement using functionally defined coordinates within the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in clinical cohorts of chronic pain and depression. We hypothesized that increased automation would produce more consistent voxel placement across repeated acquisitions particularly in reference to standard manual prescription. Data were collected and analyzed using two independent prospective transcranial magnetic stimulation studies: 1) a single-day multi-session sandwich design and 2) a longitudinal design. Participants with fibromyalgia syndrome (N=50) and major depressive disorder (N=35) underwent MRI as part of ongoing clinical studies. MEGA-PRESS and Optimized-PRESS MRS acquisitions were acquired at 3-tesla. Evaluation of the reproducibility of spatial location and tissue segmentation was assessed for: 1) manual, 2) semi-automated, and 3) automated voxel prescription approaches. Variability of grey and white matter voxel tissue composition was reduced using automated placement protocols as confirmed by common MRS software processing pipelines (Gannet; SPM-based segmentation) and via Freesurfer-based segmentation. Spatially, post-to pre-voxel center-of-gravity distance was reduced and voxel overlap increased significantly across datasets using automated compared to manual procedures. These results demonstrate the within subject reliability and reproducibility of a method for reducing variability introduced by spatial inconsistencies during MRS acquisitions. The proposed method is a meaningful advance toward improved consistency of MRS data in neuroscience and can be leveraged for multi-session and longitudinal studies that target precisely defined regions-of-interest via a coordinate-based approach.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
14.8%
2
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 1%
10.8%
3
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.6%
4
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
7.7%
5
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
NMR in Biomedicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.1%
7
Analytical Biochemistry
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.4%
8
NeuroImage: Clinical
144 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.0%
9
Frontiers in Neuroimaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
10
Human Brain Mapping
329 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.4%
11
NeuroImage: Reports
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
12
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.3%
13
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.1%
14
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
42 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
15
Journal of Neuroscience Research
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
16
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.1%
17
Aperture Neuro
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
18
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
19
Brain Research Bulletin
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
20
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
21
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
77 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
22
Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
23
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.6%