Back

Combinatorial G x G x E CRISPR screening and functional analysis highlights SLC25A39 in mitochondrial GSH transport

Shi, X.; Reinstadler, B.; Shah, H.; To, T.-L.; Byrne, K.; Summer, L.; Calvo, S. E.; Goldberger, O.; Doench, J. G.; Mootha, V. K.; Shen, H.

2021-09-22 cell biology Community evaluation
10.1101/2021.09.22.461361 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The SLC25 carrier family consists of 53 transporters that shuttle nutrients and co-factors across mitochondrial membranes1-3. The family is highly redundant and their transport activities coupled to metabolic state. Here, we introduce a pooled, dual CRISPR screening strategy that knocks out pairs of transporters in four metabolic states -- glucose, galactose, OXPHOS inhibition, and absence of pyruvate -- designed to unmask the inter-dependence of these genes. In total, we screened 63 genes in four metabolic states, corresponding to 2016 single and pair-wise genetic perturbations. We recovered 19 gene-by-environment (GxE) interactions and 9 gene-by-gene (GxG) interactions. One GxE interaction hit illustrated that the fitness defect in the mitochondrial folate carrier (SLC25A32) KO cells was genetically buffered in galactose due to a lack of substrate in de novo purine biosynthesis. Another GxE interaction hit revealed non-equivalence of the paralogous ATP/ADP exchangers (ANTs) with ANT2 specifically required during OXPHOS inhibition. GxG analysis highlighted a buffering interaction between the iron transporter SLC25A37 and the poorly characterized SLC25A39. Mitochondrial metabolite profiling, organelle transport assays, and structure-guided mutagenesis suggests SLC25A39 is critical for mitochondrial glutathione (GSH) transport. Our work underscores the importance of systemetically investigating family-wide genetic interactions between mitochondrial transporters across many metabolic environments.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.