Genome-wide mapping implicates R-loops in lineage-specific processes and formation of DNA break hotspots in neural stem/progenitor cells
Thongthip, S.; Carlson, A.; Crossley, M. P.; Schwer, B.
Show abstract
Recent work has revealed classes of recurrent DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in neural stem/progenitor cells, including transcription-associated, promoter-proximal breaks and recurrent DSB clusters in late-replicating, long neural genes. However, the mechanistic factors promoting these different classes of DSBs in neural stem/progenitor cells are not understood. Here, we elucidated the genome-wide landscape of DNA:RNA hybrid structures called "R-loops" in primary neural stem/progenitor cells in order to assess their contribution to the different classes of DNA break "hotspots". We report that R-loops in neural stem/progenitor cells are associated primarily with transcribed regions that replicate early and genes that show GC skew in their promoter region. Surprisingly, the majority of genes with recurrent DSB clusters in long, neural genes does not show substantial R-loop accumulation. We implicate R-loops in promoter-proximal DNA break formation in highly transcribed, early replicating regions and conclude that R-loops are not a driver of recurrent double-strand break cluster formation in most long, neural genes. Together, our study provides an understanding of how R-loops may contribute to DNA break hotspots and affect lineage-specific processes in neural stem/progenitor cells.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Somatic structural variant formation is guided by and influences genome architecture 97%
- Bivalent chromatin protects reversibly repressed genes from irreversible silencing 97%
- Cell type- and chromosome-specific chromatin landscapes and DNA replication programs of Drosophila testis tumor stem-cell like cells 97%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.