Back

Factors affecting return to work following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: A retrospective observational study in an occupational medicine clinic and single-surgeon practice

Khan, I.; Fatima, M.; Scholes, C.; Kandhari, V.; Ponnanna, K. M.; Herald, J.

2021-09-26 orthopedics
10.1101/2021.09.20.21263877
Show abstract

AimsDetermine factors affecting first return to work (RTW) status and time in patients treated with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (aRCR) under state-based compensation schemes in New South Wales, Australia, compared to those outside such schemes. Material and MethodsPatients undergoing aRCR by one surgeon with minimum 1-year follow-up were grouped into those under (CP) or outside (non-CP) workers or vehicle accident compensation schemes, matched by age and gender. RTW status and time were assessed using chi-square analysis and multivariable linear regression. ResultsOf 1054 available patients, 90 CP patients were identified with 29 consented and matched to non-CP (N=29). A higher proportion of CP patients (17.2 vs 0%, P<0.001) never returned to work and a lower proportion resumed pre-injury duties at first RTW (3 vs 52%, P<0.01). Median time to first RTW did not differ between CP and non-CP groups (5.1 vs 4.4, P=0.86). Smoking (P=0.007) and post-injury activity level (P=0.004) were significantly associated with longer time to first RTW, whereas compensation status was not. ConclusionsCP patients undergoing aRCR in NSW are at risk of not returning to work. For those that do return, there is no significant difference compared to non-CP in time to first RTW. Particularly, patient and management factors associated with extended time to first RTW have been identified. Interventions aimed at modifiable factors such as smoking cessation and increasing preoperative activity may improve future outcomes.

Matching journals

1
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 13%
1.8× avg
2
BMJ Open
BMJ · based on 553 published papers
Top 4%
4.5× avg
3
BJGP Open
Royal College of General Practitioners · based on 12 published papers
#1
179× avg
4
BMC Medicine
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 155 published papers
Top 0.8%
11× avg
5
Cureus
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 64 published papers
Top 3%
7.4× avg
6
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 47%
3.2%
7
Occupational and Environmental Medicine
BMJ · based on 15 published papers
Top 0.4%
48× avg
8
Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 17 published papers
Top 0.7%
23× avg
9
BMC Health Services Research
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 43 published papers
Top 3%
7.4× avg
10
Medicine
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 29 published papers
Top 5%
4.7× avg
11
Systematic Reviews
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 11 published papers
Top 1%
16× avg
12
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
BMJ · based on 32 published papers
Top 3%
5.5× avg
13
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Frontiers Media SA · based on 11 published papers
Top 1%
13× avg
14
Thorax
BMJ · based on 29 published papers
Top 2%
5.6× avg
15
ERJ Open Research
European Respiratory Society (ERS) · based on 36 published papers
Top 3%
4.1× avg