Back

Unsupervised mining of HLA-I peptidomes reveals new binding motifs and substantial false positives in community database

Sricharoensuk, C.; Boonchalermvichien, T.; Muanwien, P.; Somparn, P.; Pisitkun, T.; Sriswasdi, S.

2021-09-22 immunology
10.1101/2021.09.19.460988 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Modern vaccine designs and studies of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-mediated immune responses rely heavily on the knowledge of HLA allele-specific binding motifs and computational prediction of HLA-peptide binding affinity. Breakthroughs in HLA peptidomics have considerably expanded the databases of natural HLA ligands and enabled detailed characterizations of HLA-peptide binding specificity. However, cautions must be made when analyzing HLA peptidomics data because identified peptides may be contaminants in mass spectrometry or may weakly bind to the HLA molecules. Here, a hybrid de novo peptide sequencing approach was applied to large-scale mono-allelic HLA peptidomics datasets to uncover new ligands and refine current knowledge of HLA binding motifs. Up to 12-40% of the peptidomics data were low-binding affinity peptides with an arginine or a lysine at the C-terminus and likely to be tryptic peptide contaminants. Thousands of these peptides have been reported in a community database as legitimate ligands and might be erroneously used for training prediction models. Furthermore, unsupervised clustering of identified ligands revealed additional binding motifs for several HLA class I alleles and effectively isolated outliers that were experimentally confirmed to be false positives. Overall, our findings expanded the knowledge of HLA binding specificity and advocated for more rigorous interpretation of HLA peptidomics data that will ensure the high validity of community HLA ligandome databases.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
158 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.4%
2
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
7.0%
3
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.3%
4
Cellular & Molecular Immunology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.7%
5
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
6
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 9%
3.7%
8
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 24%
3.7%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 43%
3.0%
10
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.1%
11
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 49%
2.1%
13
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.9%
14
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
15
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.7%
16
Journal of Proteome Research
215 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
17
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 27%
1.4%
18
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.4%
19
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.4%
20
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.8%
21
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
22
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
23
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
24
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 48%
0.5%
25
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%