Back

Fluency changes due to sports-related concussion

Patel, S. M.; Grabowski, C.; Dayalu, V.; Cunningham, M. E.; Testa, A. J.

2021-09-23 sports medicine
10.1101/2021.09.19.21263791 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundAlterations in speech have long been identified as indicators of various neurologic conditions including traumatic brain injury (TBI), neurodegenerative diseases, and stroke. TBIs that can be assessed using the Glasgow Coma Scale often result in speech symptoms such as dysarthria and occasionally neurogenic stuttering. The manifestation of symptoms including the specific changes in speech occurring in mild TBIs (or concussions) may differ from more severe head injuries. This work aims to compare speech fluency in sport-related concussion to baseline performance as well as non-athlete controls. MethodsA total of 230 Division I student athletes participated in pre-season speech testing. Of these, 12 students (18-22 years) who sustained a concussion also participated in speech testing in the days following diagnosis of concussion. Samples of picture descriptions were independently coded by three trained raters as 17 error types within the three traditional categories of errors defined in fluency analysis (Stuttering-Like Disfluency, Articulation Error, Other Disfluency). ResultsWithin-subjects analysis comparing the difference in percent error scores at baseline and post-concussion revealed significant differences for interjections (t(11)=-2.678, p< .05). The Other Disfluency category was also significantly different (t(11)= -2.735, p< .05), with more errors occurring after a concussion. No change in the Stuttering-Like Disfluency (t(11)= -0.799, p>.05) or Articulation Error category (t(11)=-0.045, p>.05) was found. ConclusionsThese results demonstrate that speech changes occur following mild sports-related concussions. Specifically, the rate of interjections increased in a limited sample of college athletes who sustain a concussion. Changes in additional error types (fillers, pauses) were trending, but were not significant potentially due to the low sample size. Future studies should consider speech as a diagnostic tool for concussion.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 8%
19.3%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 4%
10.8%
3
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.7%
4
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
8.7%
5
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
7
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.7%
8
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
9
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.4%
10
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
11
Medical Research Archives
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
12
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
13
Biological Psychiatry
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
14
Journal of Neurology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.0%
15
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
16
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
17
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.8%
18
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
19
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
Journal of Neurotrauma
27 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
21
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
23
Sleep Medicine
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
24
BMC Neurology
12 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%