Back

DNA dynamics dictates p53 functional outcome

Safieh, J.; Chazan, A.; Vyas, P.; Saleem, H.; Danin-Poleg, Y.; Ron, D.; Haran, T. E.

2021-09-19 biochemistry
10.1101/2021.09.18.460898 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The tumor suppressor protein p53 is situated in the midst of a complex network that is activated in response to cellular stress. An unresolved question is how p53 activates its myriad target genes in response to the severity of the stress signal and consequently coordinates the functional outcome in a timely manner. We have previously shown that DNA torsional flexibility distinguishes among p53 response elements (REs). Here we calculated the flexibility of over 200 p53 REs. By connecting functional pathways of p53-dependent genes to the calculated flexibility of their REs, we show that genes belonging to pathways activated rapidly upon stress (e.g., cell-cycle arrest, energy metabolism and innate immunity) contain REs that are significantly more flexible relative to REs of genes involved in pathways that need to be more strictly regulated or are activated later in the response to stress (e.g., intrinsic apoptosis and p53 negative regulation). The global structural properties of several p53 REs belonging to the different pathways were experimentally validated. Additionally, reporter gene expression driven by flexible p53 REs occurred at lower p53 levels and with faster rates than expression from rigid REs. Moreover, analysis of published endogenous mRNA levels of p53 target genes as a function of the flexibility of their REs support our hypothesis. Overall, we demonstrate that DNA flexibility of p53 REs contributes significantly to the timely expression of p53 target genes and thereby plays an important role in cell-faith decisions in the p53 circuity.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.