Identification of REM Sleep Behavior Disorder by Structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Machine Learning
Mei, J.; Rahayel, S.; Desrosiers, C.; Postuma, R. B.; Montplaisir, J.; Carrier, J.; Monchi, O.; Frasnelli, J.; Gagnon, J.-F.
Show abstract
BackgroundIdiopathic rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder (iRBD) is a major risk factor for synucleinopathies, and patients often present with clinical signs and morphological brain changes. However, there is a heterogeneity in the presentation and progression of these alterations, and brain regions that are more vulnerable to neurodegeneration remain to be determined. ObjectivesTo assess the feasibility of morphology-based machine learning in the identification and subtyping of iRBD. MethodsFor the classification tasks [iRBD (n=48) vs controls (n=41); iRBD vs Parkinsons disease (n=29); iRBD with mild cognitive impairment (n=16) vs without mild cognitive impairment (n=32)], machine learning models were trained with morphometric measurements (thickness, surface area, volume, and deformation) extracted from T1-weighted structural magnetic resonance imaging. Model performance and the most discriminative brain regions were analyzed and identified. ResultsA high accuracy was reported for iRBD vs controls (79.6%, deformation of the caudal middle frontal gyrus and putamen, thinning of the superior frontal gyrus, and reduced volume of the inferior parietal cortex and insula), iRBD vs Parkinsons disease (82%, smaller volume and surface area of the insula, lower thinning of the entorhinal cortex and lingual gyrus, and greater volume of the fusiform gyrus), and iRBD with vs without mild cognitive impairment (84.8%, thinning of the pars triangularis, superior temporal gyrus, transverse temporal cortex, larger surface area of the superior temporal gyrus, and deformation of isthmus of the cingulate gyrus). ConclusionsMorphology-based machine learning approaches may allow for detection and subtyping of iRBD, potentially enabling efficient preclinical identification of synucleinopathies.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- White matter microstructure in Parkinson’s disease with and without elevated REM sleep muscle tone 96%
- Apathy progression is associated with brain atrophy and white matter damage in Parkinson's disease 95%
- CSF and PET biomarkers for noradrenergic dysfunction in neurodegenerative diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Distinct Longitudinal Clinical-Neuroanatomical Trajectories in Parkinson’s Disease Clinical Subtypes: Insight Towards Precision Medicine 96%
- Decoupling of global brain activity and cerebrospinal fluid flow in Parkinson's cognitive decline 96%
- Nigral pathology contributes to microstructural integrity of striatal and frontal tracts in Parkinson's disease 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Phase II study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of prasinezumab in early Parkinson’s disease (PASADENA): rationale, design and baseline data 93%
- Vagus nerve cross-sectional area in patients with Parkinson’s Disease – an ultrasound case-control study 93%
- Dopamine buffering capacity imaging: A pharmacodynamic fMRI method for staging Parkinson disease 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Nigral volume loss in prodromal, early, and moderate Parkinson’s disease 96%
- Microstructure predicts non-motor outcomes following Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson’s disease 95%
- Identification and prediction of Parkinson's disease subtypes and progression using machine learning in two cohorts. 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cognitive and Motor Correlates of Grey and White Matter Pathology in Parkinsons Disease 96%
- A neuroimaging measure to capture heterogeneous patterns of atrophy in Parkinson’s disease and dementia with Lewy bodies 96%
- Neural Correlates of Impulsive Compulsive Behaviors in Parkinson’s Disease: A Japanese Retrospective Study 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.