Back

Comparison Of Woody Species Diversity And Population Structure Status Across Different Management Practice In The Gola Natural Vegetation, Easter Hararghe, Oromia Of Ethiopia

Hussein, A.; Hussein, A.

2021-09-17 ecology
10.1101/2021.09.17.460790 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The research was carried out at Gola natural vegetation eastern Ethiopia, to identify and Woody species' diversity, richness, evenness, and population structural status will be documented, as well as their diversity, richness, evenness, and population structural status will be analyzed. Using systematic sampling procedures, the woody species diversity and population structure of species were examined in 73 quadrats, each measuring 20 m x 20 m for trees and 5 m x 5 m for shrubs and climbers, within three land use systems: farm land (FL), grazing land (GL), and protected area (PA). The diameter at breast height (DBH), richness, evenness, and density of woody species were all measured in the vegetation. The Shannon Weiner Diversity Index was used to examine the diversity of vegetation. A total of 52 woody species belonging to 33 genera, and there were 24 families found. in Gola natural vegetation. Fabaceae was represented by the highest number of species comprising 8 (18.18 %), 9 (25.00 %) and 8 (32%) of the total number of plant species found in PA, GL, and FL. The PA site had significantly highest population density of vegetation, followed by the GL site, while the FL site had the lowest. The total basal area of PA, GL and FL were 43.73, 31.68 and 22.62 m2/ha, respectively. PA site had significantly (P= 0.042) highest Shannons diversity index value with mean (3.53) than the others two land use system. This result suggests significance of anthropological disturbance like grazing and farming on woody species diversity and natural forest ecosystem appeared to be adverse dependent on the category and severity of the anthropogenic disturbances.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.