Back

In silico investigation of biomechanical response of a human subjected to primary blast

Sutar, S.; Ganpule, S.

2021-09-16 bioengineering
10.1101/2021.09.16.460591 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The response of the brain to the explosion induced primary blast waves is actively sought. Over the past decade, reasonable progress has been made in the fundamental understanding of bTBI using head surrogates and animal models. Yet, the current understanding of how blast waves interact with the human is in nascent stages, primarily due to lack of data in humans. The biomechanical response in human is critically required so that connection to the aforementioned bTBI models can be faithfully established. Here, using a detailed, full-body human model, we elucidate the biomechanical cascade of the brain under a primary blast. The input to the model is incident overpressure as achieved by specifying charge mass and standoff distance through ConWep. The full-body model allows to holistically probe short- (<5 ms) and long-term (200 ms) brain biomechanical responses. The full-body model has been extensively validated against impact loading in the past. In this work, we validate the head model against blast loading. We also incorporate structural anisotropy of the brain white matter. Blast wave human interaction is modeled using a conventional weapon modeling approach. We demonstrate that the blast wave transmission, linear and rotational motion of the head are dominant pathways for the biomechanical loading of the brain, and these loading paradigms generate distinct biomechanical fields within the brain. Blast transmission and linear motion of the head govern the volumetric response, whereas the rotational motion of the head governs the deviatoric response. We also observe that blast induced head rotation alone produces a diffuse injury pattern in white matter fiber tracts. Lastly, we find that the biomechanical response under blast is comparable to the impact event. These insights will augment laboratory and clinical investigations of bTBI and help devise better blast mitigation strategies.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.0%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 2%
15.0%
3
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
4
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
5
Frontiers in Physics
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.7%
7
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.9%
50% of probability mass above
8
Journal of Neurotrauma
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
9
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.5%
10
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 13%
2.1%
11
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
12
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
13
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
14
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
15
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
16
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
17
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
18
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.7%
19
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 41%
1.7%
20
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
21
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
22
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
23
Journal of Neuroscience Research
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
24
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
25
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
26
Nano Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
27
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.9%
28
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 42%
0.8%
29
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
30
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%