Back

Environmental correlates and functional consequences of bill divergence in island song sparrows

Gamboa, M. P.; Ghalambor, C. K.; Sillett, T. S.; Funk, W. C.; Furbush, R. A.; Husak, J. F.; Danner, R. M.

2021-09-17 ecology
10.1101/2021.09.15.460486 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Inferring the environmental selection pressures responsible for phenotypic variation is a challenge in adaptation studies as traits often have multiple functions and are shaped by complex selection regimes. We provide experimental evidence that morphology of the multifunctional avian bill is related to climate, not foraging efficiency, in song sparrows (Melospiza melodia) on the California Channel Islands. Our research builds on a study in song sparrow museum specimens that demonstrated a positive correlation between bill surface area and maximum temperature, suggesting a greater demand for dry heat dissipation in hotter, xeric environments. We sampled contemporary sparrow populations across three climatically distinct islands to test the alternate hypotheses that song sparrow bill morphology is either a product of vegetative differences with functional consequences for foraging efficiency or related to maximum temperature and, consequently, important for thermoregulation. Measurements of >500 live individuals indicated a significant, positive relationship between maximum temperature and bill surface area when correcting for body size. In contrast, maximum bite force, seed extraction time, and vegetation on breeding territories (a proxy for food resources) were not significantly associated with bill dimensions. While we cannot exclude the influence of foraging ability and diet on bill morphology, our results are consistent with the hypothesis that variation in song sparrows need for thermoregulatory capacity across the northern Channel Islands selects for divergence in bill surface area. SUMMARY STATEMENTIsland song sparrow bill differences are correlated with climate, not vegetation, and experimental evidence finds no functional effect on foraging efficiency. This suggests many factors shape this multifunctional trait.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
9.2%
2
Oecologia
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.5%
3
Journal of Animal Ecology
75 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.4%
4
Journal of Avian Biology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.0%
5
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.1%
6
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.1%
7
The American Naturalist
125 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.1%
8
Biotropica
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.9%
9
Marine Ecology Progress Series
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.3%
10
Ibis
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
50% of probability mass above
11
Functional Ecology
61 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.0%
12
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.5%
13
Behavioral Ecology
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.3%
14
Journal of Thermal Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
15
Ecology Letters
135 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
16
Ecology
85 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.8%
17
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.7%
18
Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
19
Journal of Experimental Biology
259 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
20
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
21
Ethology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
22
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 68%
1.1%
23
Ecography
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
24
Oikos
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
25
Biology Letters
76 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
26
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.1%
27
Evolutionary Ecology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
28
Animal Behaviour
73 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
29
Journal of Biogeography
46 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
30
Movement Ecology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%