Back

Intronization enhances expression of S-protein and other transgenes challenged by cryptic splicing

Tomberg, K.; Antunes, L.; Pan, Y.; Hepkema, J.; Garyfallos, D. A.; Mahfouz, A.; Bradley, A.

2021-09-15 genetics
10.1101/2021.09.15.460454 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The natural habitat of SARS-CoV-2 is the cytoplasm of a mammalian cell where it replicates its genome and expresses its proteins. While SARS-CoV-2 genes and hence its codons are presumably well optimized for mammalian protein translation, they have not been sequence optimized for nuclear expression. The cDNA of the Spike protein harbors over a hundred predicted splice sites and produces mostly aberrant mRNA transcripts when expressed in the nucleus. While different codon optimization strategies increase the proportion of full-length mRNA, they do not directly address the underlying splicing issue with commonly detected cryptic splicing events hindering the full expression potential. Similar splicing characteristics were also observed in other transgenes. By inserting multiple short introns throughout different transgenes, significant improvement in expression was achieved, including >7-fold increase for Spike transgene. Provision of a more natural genomic landscape offers a novel way to achieve multi-fold improvement in transgene expression.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.0%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Nucleic Acids Research
◐ 1281 papers in training set
Top 1%
12.0%
Similar papers in this journal
3
RNA
● 189 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.3%
Similar papers in this journal
4
RNA Biology
○ 78 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.4%
Similar papers in this journal
5
Viruses
○ 332 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.3%
Similar papers in this journal
6
Frontiers in Genetics
○ 230 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.3%
7
Journal of Molecular Biology
○ 232 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.8%
8
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
○ 494 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.4%
9
Molecular Therapy - Methods & Clinical Development
○ 38 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
10
Genes
○ 144 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
50% of probability mass above
11
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.7%
12
Virus Research
○ 37 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
13
iScience
○ 1154 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.5%
14
Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids
○ 25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
15
Molecular Therapy
○ 81 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
16
Journal of Virology
● 499 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
17
Vaccines
○ 198 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
18
Mobile DNA
○ 31 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
19
Methods
○ 34 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
20
Life Science Alliance
● 285 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
21
Journal of Biological Chemistry
○ 690 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
22
PeerJ
◐ 308 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.1%
23
PLOS Pathogens
● 820 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.1%
24
The FEBS Journal
○ 93 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
25
BMC Biotechnology
○ 14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
26
ACS Synthetic Biology
● 287 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
27
FEBS Letters
○ 47 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
28
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
○ 98 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
29
Bioscience Reports
● 27 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
30
Biology
○ 45 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.