Humoral immune responses against seasonal coronaviruses predict efficiency of SARS-CoV-2 spike targeting, FcγR activation, and corresponding COVID-19 disease severity
Garrido, J. J.; Medina, M.; Bravo, F.; McGee, S.; Fuentes, F.; Calvo, M.; Bowman, J. W.; Bahl, C. D.; Barria, M. I.; Brachman, R. A.; Alvarez, R. A.
Show abstract
Despite SARS-CoV-2 being a "novel" coronavirus, several studies suggest that detection of anti-spike IgG early in infection may be attributable to the amplification of humoral memory responses against seasonal hCoVs in severe COVID-19 patients. In this study, we examined this concept by characterizing anti-spike IgG from a cohort of non-hospitalized convalescent individuals with a spectrum of COVID-19 severity. We observed that anti-spike IgG levels positively correlated with disease severity, higher IgG cross-reactivity against betacoronaviruses (SARS-CoV-1 and OC43), and higher levels of proinflammatory Fc gamma receptor 2a and 3a (Fc{gamma}R2a & Fc{gamma}R3a) activation. In examining the levels of IgG targeting betacoronavirus conserved and immunodominant epitopes versus disease severity, we observed a positive correlation with the levels of IgG targeting the conserved S2FP region, and an inverse correlation with two conserved epitopes around the heptad repeat (HR) 2 region. In comparing the levels of IgG targeting non-conserved epitopes, we observed that only one of three non-conserved immunodominant epitopes correlated with disease severity. Notably, the levels of IgG targeting the receptor binding domain (RBD) were inversely correlated with severity. Importantly, targeting of the RBD and HR2 regions have both been shown to mediate SARS-CoV-2 neutralization. These findings show that, aside from antibody (Ab) targeting of the RBD region, humoral memory responses against seasonal betacoronaviruses are potentially an important factor in dictating COVID-19 severity, with anti-HR2-dominant Ab profiles representing protective memory responses, while an anti-S2FP dominant Ab profiles indicate deleterious recall responses. Though these profiles are masked in whole antigen profiling, these analyses suggest that distinct Ab memory responses are detectable with epitope targeting analysis. These findings have important implications for predicting severity of SARS-CoV-2 infections (primary and reinfections), and may predict vaccine efficacy in subpopulations with different dominant antibody epitope profiles.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The longitudinal kinetics of antibodies in COVID-19 recovered patients over 14 months 96%
- Non-neutralizing SARS-CoV-2 N-terminal domain antibodies protect mice against severe disease using Fc-mediated effector functions 96%
- Variant-specific humoral immune response to SARS-CoV-2 escape mutants arising in clinically severe, prolonged infection 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Infants and young children generate more durable antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 infection than adults 96%
- Ancestral SARS-CoV-2 immune imprinting persists on RBD but not NTD after sequential Omicron infections 95%
- Immune Profiles To Distinguish Hospitalized Versus Ambulatory COVID-19 Cases In Older Patients 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- SARS-CoV-2 evolution and patient immunological history shape the breadth and potency of antibody-mediated immunity 96%
- Role of IgM and IgA Antibodies in the Neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 96%
- Elite neutralizers of human cytomegalovirus are characterized by high magnitude plasma IgG responses against multiple glycoprotein complexes 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- BNT162b2 induced neutralizing and non-neutralizing antibody functions against SARSCoV-2 diminish with age 95%
- Spike-specific IgG4 generated post BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination is inhibitory when directly competing with functional IgG subclasses 95%
- Early induction of SARS-CoV-2 specific T cells associates with rapid viral clearance and mild disease in COVID-19 patients 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.