Back

Efficacy of two doses of COVID-19 vaccine against severe COVID-19 in those with risk conditions and residual risk to the clinically extremely vulnerable: the REACT-SCOT case-control study

McKeigue, P. M.; McAllister, D.; Robertson, C.; Hutchinson, S. J.; McGurnaghan, S.; Stockton, D.; Colhoun, H. M.

2021-09-16 epidemiology
10.1101/2021.09.13.21262360 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectivesTo determine whether COVID-19 efficacy varies with clinical risk category and to investigate risk factors for severe COVID-19 in those who have received two doses of vaccine. DesignMatched case-control study (REACT-SCOT). SettingPopulation of Scotland from 1 December 2020 to 8 September 2021. Main outcome measureSevere COVID-19, defined as cases with entry to critical care or fatal outcome. ResultsEfficacy against severe COVID-19 of two doses of vaccine was 94% (95 percent CI 93% to 96%) in those without designated risk conditions, 89% (95 percent CI 86% to 91%) in those with moderate risk conditions, but only 73% (95 percent CI 64% to 79%) in those designated as clinically extremely vulnerable (CEV) and eligible for shielding. Of the 641 cases of severe COVID-19 in double-vaccinated individuals, 47% had moderate risk conditions and 38% were CEV. In the double-vaccinated CEV group, the rate ratio for severe disease (with no risk condition as reference category) was highest in solid organ transplants at 101 (95% CI 47 to 214) but even in this subgroup the absolute risk of severe COVID-19 was low (35 cases in 23678 person-months of follow-up). ConclusionsTwo doses of vaccine protect against severe COVID-19 in CEV individuals but the residual risk in double-vaccinated individuals remains far higher in those who are CEV than in those who are not. These results lay a basis for determining eligibility for additional measures including passive immunization to protect those at highest risk.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.