Back

Health systems performance for hypertension control using a cascade of care approach in South Africa, 2008-2017

Benade, M.; Prasad, S. K.; Mchiza, Z.; Yan, L. D.; Brennan, A. T.; Davies, J.; Sudharsanan, N.; Manne-Goehler, J.; Fox, M. P.; Bor, J.; Rosen, S.; Stokes, A. C.

2021-09-16 public and global health
10.1101/2021.09.13.21251870 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundHypertension is a major contributor to global morbidity and mortality. In South Africa, the government has employed a whole systems approach to address the growing burden of non-communicable diseases. We used a novel incident care cascade approach to measure changes in the South African health systems ability to manage hypertension between 2008 and 2017. MethodsWe used data from Waves 1-5 of the National Income Dynamics Study (NIDS) to estimate trends in the hypertension care cascade and unmet treatment need across four successive cohorts with incident hypertension. We used a negative binomial regression to identify factors that may predict higher rates of hypertension control, controlling for socio-demographic and healthcare factors. The largest cascade attrition occurred prior to diagnosis. ResultsIn 2011, 19{middle dot}6% (95%CI 14{middle dot}2, 26{middle dot}2) of individuals with incident hypertension were diagnosed, 15{middle dot}4% (95%CI 10{middle dot}8, 21{middle dot}4) were on treatment and 7.1% had controlled blood pressure. By 2017, the proportion of individuals with diagnosed incident hypertension had increased to 24{middle dot}4% (95%CI 15{middle dot}9, 35{middle dot}4) with increases in treatment (23{middle dot}3%, 95%CI 15{middle dot}0, 34{middle dot}3) and control (22{middle dot}1%, 95%CI 14{middle dot}1, 33{middle dot}.0) were also observed, translating to a decrease in unmet need from 92{middle dot}9% in 2011 to 77{middle dot}9% in 2017. Multivariable regression showed that participants with incident hypertension in 2017 were 3{middle dot}01 (95%CI 1{middle dot}77, 5{middle dot}13) times more likely to have a controlled blood pressure compared to those in 2011. ConclusionsThe proportion of people with incident hypertension who successfully progressed to controlled blood pressure tripled between 2011 and 2017 in South Africa. Despite these improvements, a low absolute proportion of the population were able to control their blood pressure and a high burden of unmet need remains. Summary BoxO_ST_ABSWhat is already knownC_ST_ABSO_LIPrevalent cascades provide insight to where losses in care cascades occur. C_LIO_LIWhile mostly used in the management of HIV, recently they have also been adopted in studying the management of non-communicable diseases on a population level. C_LIO_LIPrevalent hypertension cascades in South Africa showed a high burden of unmet need, with the biggest losses where lost between disease development and diagnosis. C_LI What are the new findingsO_LIIncident hypertension cascades improved from 2008 to 2017 in South Africa. C_LI What do the new findings implyO_LIIncident cascades provide an improved means to measure changes in management cascades as this allows us to distinguish between historical and current health system performance. C_LIO_LIOur data show that while substantial improvements in the care cascade occurred between 2008 and 2017, a large burden of unmet need remains. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.7%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 16%
12.4%
3
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 2%
10.5%
4
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
5
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.9%
7
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.6%
8
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
9
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
10
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
11
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
12
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
13
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
14
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
15
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.3%
16
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
17
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
18
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
19
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
20
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 74%
0.7%
21
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
22
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
23
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
24
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%