Back

SAMD1 Distribution Patterns in Mouse Atherosclerosis Models Suggest Roles in LDL Retention, Antigen Presentation, and Cell Phenotype Modulation

Campbell, B.; Bourassa, P.; Aiello, R.

2021-09-12 pathology
10.1101/2021.09.12.459413 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The theory that lesions formed by retention of circulating LDL can then progress to complicated atherosclerotic lesions has been a subject of debate, as has the mechanism of retention. In earlier work, we identified SAMD1, a protein expressed by intimal smooth muscle cells in human lesions that appears to irreversibly bind apoB-Lps in extracellular matrix near the lumen. We hypothesized this binding could contribute to the formation of lesions in mice, and that inhibiting binding could reduce lesion growth. In mouse models of atherosclerosis, we found that SAMD1 binds LDL; that SAMD1/apoB complex is ingested by intimal cells; and that recognizable epitopes of the SAMD1/apoB complex survive some degree of catabolism in foam cell. These data appear to support the SAMD1/LDL retention hypothesis of lesion growth. Despite apparently irreversible binding of human LDL to full-length human SAMD1, efficient anti-SAMD1-antibody inhibitors were created. In vivo lesion targeting of inhibitors was demonstrated by MRI, ultrasound, and ex vivo microscopy. However, only non-statistically significant reductions in spontaneous lesion size in apoE-/- mice were seen after 12 weeks of treatment with PEG-fab inhibitors of SAMD1/LDL binding. In contrast, these inhibitors substantially reduced LDL retention in carotid injury lesions in apoE-/- and LDLR-/- mice 7 days after injury. The most obvious difference between injury lesions and early spontaneous lesions is the presence of numerous smooth muscle cells and associated extracellular matrix in the injury lesions. Thus, SAMD1 may be involved in retention of apoB-Lps in mouse lesions, but not until smooth muscle cells have entered the intima. In addition, SAMD1 is seen throughout arteries in changing patterns that suggest broader and more complicated roles in atherosclerosis.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
65 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.6%
2
Journal of Lipid Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.2%
3
Atherosclerosis
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.2%
50% of probability mass above
4
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.7%
5
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.7%
6
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 20%
2.1%
7
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 37%
2.0%
8
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
9
Journal of Biological Chemistry
641 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
10
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
11
Cardiovascular Research
33 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
12
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
13
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.0%
14
Circulation Research
39 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
15
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.0%
16
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
17
The Journal of Immunology
146 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
18
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
19
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
20
The FASEB Journal
175 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
21
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 80%
0.5%
22
Metabolism
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%