Financial and Non-financial Conflicts of Interest Among the Japanese Government Advisory Board Members Concerning Coronavirus Disease 2019
Mamada, H.; Murayama, A.; Ozaki, A.; Hashimoto, T.; Saito, H.; Sawano, T.; Bhandari, D.; Shrestha, S.; Tanimoto, T.
Show abstract
ObjectivesThis study aimed to assess the extent of conflicts of interest among the Japanese government COVID-19 advisory board members and elucidate the accuracy of conflicts of interest (COI) disclosure and management strategies. MethodsUsing the payment data from all 79 pharmaceutical companies in Japan between 2017 and 2018 and direct research grants from the Japanese government between 2019 and 2020, we evaluated the extent of financial and non-financial COI among all 20 Japanese government COVID-19 advisory board members. ResultsJapanese government COVID-19 advisory board members were predominantly male (75.0%) and physicians (50.0%). Between 2019 and 2020, two members (10.0%) received a total of $819,244 in government research funding. Another five members (25.0%) received $419,725 in payments, including $223,183 in personal fees, from 28 pharmaceutical companies between 2017 and 2018. The average value of the pharmaceutical payments was $20,986 (standard deviation: $81,762). Further, neither the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare nor the Japanese Cabinet Secretariat disclosed financial or non-financial COI with industry. Further, the government and had no policies for managing COI among advisory board members. ConclusionsThis study found that the Japanese government COVID-19 advisory board had financial and non-financial COI with pharmaceutical companies and the government. Further, there were no rigorous COI management strategies for the COVID-19 advisory board members. Any government must ensure the independence of scientific advisory boards by implementing more rigorous and transparent management strategies that require the declaration and public disclosure of all COI.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Economic impact of the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic on acute care hospitals in Japan 93%
- The relationship between new PCR positive cases and going out in public during the COVID-19 epidemic in Japan 93%
- Adverse events affecting recovery from seasonal influenza vaccination in the hypertensive population: A population-based pharmacovigilance analysis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Adenovirus and RNA-based COVID-19 vaccines: perceptions and acceptance among healthcare workers 92%
- Factors Associated with Serious Psychological Distress during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan 92%
- Risk factors for severity on admission and the disease progression during hospitalization in a large cohort of COVID-19 patients in Japan 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Spread of infection and treatment interruption among Japanese workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study 93%
- Health Economic Burden of COVID-19 in Saudi Arabia 91%
- SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence and Risk Factors among Convalescents in Sichuan Province, China: a retrospective cohort study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Pharmaceutical Payments to Japanese Board-Certified Infectious Disease Specialists: A Four-year Retrospective Analysis of Payments from 92 Pharmaceutical Companies between 2016 and 2019 96%
- SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence among healthcare workers in general hospitals and clinics in Japan 91%
- The psychological impact of 'mild lockdown' in Japan during the COVID-19 pandemic: a nationwide survey under a declared state of emergency 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Healthcare workers’ worries and Monkeypox vaccine advocacy during the first month of the WHO Monkeypox alert: Cross-sectional survey in Saudi Arabia 92%
- Comparison of Monkeypox disease knowledge and perception among the healthcare workers versus the general population during the first month of the WHO emerging infectious disease alert 91%
- Clinical advancement of patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant in Shanghai, China 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.