Back

Physiological noise optimizes multiplexed coding of vibrotactile-like signals in somatosensory cortex

Kamaleddin, M. A.; Shifman, A.; Sigal, D. M.; Prescott, S. A.

2021-09-14 neuroscience
10.1101/2021.09.11.459897 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Neurons can use different aspects of their spiking to simultaneously represent (multiplex) different features of a stimulus. For example, some pyramidal neurons in primary somatosensory cortex (S1) use the rate and timing of their spikes to respectively encode the intensity and frequency of vibrotactile stimuli. Doing so has several requirements. Because they fire at low rates, pyramidal neurons cannot entrain 1:1 with high-frequency (100-600 Hz) inputs and instead must skip (i.e. not respond to) some stimulus cycles. The proportion of skipped cycles must vary inversely with stimulus intensity for firing rate to encode stimulus intensity. Spikes must phase lock to the stimulus for spike times (intervals) to encode stimulus frequency but, in addition, skipping must occur irregularly to avoid aliasing. Using simulations and in vitro experiments in which S1 pyramidal neurons were stimulated with inputs emulating those induced by vibrotactile stimuli, we show that fewer cycles are skipped as stimulus intensity increases, as required for rate coding, and that physiological noise induces irregular skipping without disrupting phase locking, as required for temporal coding. This occurs because the reliability and precision of spikes evoked by small- amplitude, fast-onset signals are differentially sensitive to noise. Simulations confirmed that differences in stimulus intensity and frequency can be well discriminated based on differences in spike rate or timing, respectively, but only in the presence of noise. Our results show that multiplexed coding by S1 pyramidal neurons is facilitated rather than degraded by physiological levels of noise. In fact, multiplexing is optimal under physiologically noisy conditions.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.