Canonical retinotopic shifts under an inverse force field explain predictive remapping
Adeyefa-Olasupo, I.; Xiao, Z.; Nandy, A. S.
Show abstract
Predictive remapping -- the ability of cells in retinotopic brain areas to transiently exhibit spatio-temporal retinotopic shifts beyond the spatial extent of their classical receptive fields -- has been proposed as a primary mechanism that stabilizes our percept of the visual world around the time of saccadic eye movements. Despite the well documented effects of predictive remapping, no study to date has been able to provide a mechanistic account of the neural computations and architecture that actively mediate this ubiquitous phenomenon. We propose a novel neurobiologically inspired general model of predictive remapping in which the underlying pre-saccadic attentional and oculomotor signals manifest as three temporally overlapping forces that act on retinotopic brain areas. These three forces - a centripetal one toward the center of gaze, a convergent one toward the saccade target and a translational one parallel to the saccade trajectory - act in an inverse force field and govern the spatio-temporal dynamics of predictive remapping of population receptive fields. The predictions of our model are borne out by the spatio-temporal changes in sensitivity to probe stimuli in human subjects around the time of an eye movement and are consistent with findings of predictive shifts in the receptive fields of cells in the superior colliculus, frontal eye fields, lateral intraparietal area, and visual area V4.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Much higher covariation with foveation timing by superior colliculus than primary visual cortical neuronal activity 95%
- Eccentricity-Dependent Saccadic Reaction Time: The Roles of Foveal Magnification and Attentional Orienting 94%
- Temporal-Coherence Induces Binding in Responses to Sound Sequences in Ferret Auditory Cortex 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.