Effectiveness of Mass Vaccination in Brazil against Severe COVID-19 Cases
Villela, D. A. M.; de Noronha, T. G.; Bastos, L. S.; Pacheco, A. G. F.; Cruz, O. G.; Carvalho, L. M.; Codeco, C. T.; Gomes, M. F. C.; Coelho, F. C.; Freitas, L. P.; Lana, R. M.; Porto, V. B. G.; Camacho, L. A.; Struchiner, C. J.
Show abstract
BackgroundMass vaccination campaigns started in Brazil on January/2021 with CoronaVac followed by ChAdOx1 nCov-19, and BNT162b2 mRNA vaccines. Target populations initially included vulnerable groups such as people older than 80 years, with comorbidities, of indigenous origin, and healthcare workers. Younger age groups were gradually included. MethodsA national cohort of 66.3 million records was compiled by linking registry-certified COVID-19 vaccination records from the Brazilian National Immunization Program with information on severe COVID-19 cases and deaths. Cases and deaths were aggregated by state and age group. Mixed-effects Poisson models were used to estimate the rate of severe cases and deaths among vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals, and the corresponding estimates of vaccine effectiveness by vaccine platform and age group. The study period is from mid-January to mid-July 2021. ResultsEstimates of vaccine effectiveness preventing deaths were highest at 97.9% (95% CrI: 93.5-99.8) among 20-39 years old with ChAdOx1 nCov-19, at 82.7% (95% CrI: 80.7-84.6) among 40-59 years old with CoronaVac, and at 89.9% (87.8--91.8) among 40-59 years old with partial immunization of BNT162b2. For all vaccines combined in the full regimen, the effectiveness preventing severe cases among individuals aged 80+ years old was 35.9% (95% CrI: 34.9-36.9) which is lower than that observed for individuals aged 60-79 years (61.0%, 95% CrI: 60.5-61.5). ConclusionDespite varying effectiveness estimates, Brazils population benefited from vaccination in preventing severe COVID-19 outcomes. Results, however, suggest significant vaccine-specific reductions in effectiveness by age, given by differences between age groups 60-79 years and over 80 years.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of CoronaVac on Covid-19 outcomes of elderly adults in a large and socially unequal Brazilian city: A target trial emulation study 97%
- Efficacy and Safety of an Inactivated Whole-Virion SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine (CoronaVac) in Brazilian Healthcare Professionals: The PROFISCOV Trial 96%
- Modelling optimal vaccination strategies against Covid-19 in a context of Gamma variant predominance in Brazil 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effectiveness of the WHO-authorized Covid-19 Vaccines: a Rapid Review of Global Reports till June 30, 2021 95%
- Role of COVID-19 vaccinal status in admitted children during OMICRON variant circulation in Rio de Janeiro, city- Preliminary report 95%
- Safety and efficacy of two immunization schedules with an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in adults. A randomized non-inferiority clinical trial 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Time-Varying Effectiveness of Three Covid-19 Vaccines in Puerto Rico 95%
- Protection of homologous and heterologous boosters after primary schemes of rAd26-rAd5, ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and BBIBP-CorV during the Omicron outbreak in adults of 50 years and older in Argentina: a test-negative case-control study 94%
- Effectiveness of CoronaVac in the setting of high SARS-CoV-2 P.1 variant transmission in Brazil: A test-negative case-control study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness against laboratory confirmed symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection, COVID-19 related hospitalizations and deaths, among individuals aged 65 years or more in Portugal: a cohort study based on data-linkage of national registries February-September 2021 96%
- Immunogenicity and reactogenicity of a third dose of BNT162b2 vaccine for COVID-19 after a primary regimen with BBIBP-CorV or BNT162b2 vaccines in Lima, Peru 95%
- Is the BioNTech-Pfizer COVID-19 vaccination effective in elderly populations? Results from population data from Bavaria, Germany 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Safety and Immunogenicity of CoronaVac and ChAdOx1 Against the SARS-CoV-2 Circulating Variants of Concern (Alpha, Delta, Beta) in Thai Healthcare Workers 93%
- Benefit-Risk Assessment Of COVID-19 Vaccine, Mrna (Mrna-1273) For Males Age 18-64 Years 92%
- Modern approaches to predicting vaccine hesitancy: A scoping review 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.