Back

Hospital-level work organization drives the spread of SARS-CoV-2 within hospitals: insights from a multi-ward model

Oodally, A.; Hammami, P.; Reilhac, A.; Guerineau de Lamerie, G.; Opatowski, L.; Temime, L.

2021-09-17 epidemiology
10.1101/2021.09.09.21262609 medRxiv
Show abstract

extensive protective measures, SARS-CoV-2 widely circulates within healthcare facilities, posing a significant risk to both patients and healthcare workers. Several control strategies have been proposed; however, the global efficacy of local measures implemented at the ward level may depend on hospital-level organizational factors. We aimed at better understanding the role of between-ward interactions on nosocomial outbreaks and their control in a multiward psychiatric hospital in Western France. We built a stochastic compartmental transmission model of SARS-CoV-2 in the 24-wards hospital, accounting for the various infection states among patients and staff, and between-ward connections resulting from staff sharing. We first evaluated the potential of hospital-wide diffusion of local outbreaks, depending on the ward they started in. We then assessed control strategies, including a screening area upon patient admission, an isolation ward for COVID-19 positive patients and changes in staff schedules to limit between-ward mixing. Much larger and more frequent outbreaks occurred when the index case originated in one of the most connected wards with up to four times more transmissions when compared to the more isolated ones. The number of wards where infection spreads was brought down by up to 53 % after reducing staff sharing. Finally, we found that setting up an isolation ward reduced the number of transmissions by up to 70 %, while adding a screening area before admission seemed ineffective. Significance StatementHospital acquired COVID-19 poses a major problem to many countries. Despite extensive protective measures, transmission within hospitals still occurs regularly and threatens those essential to the fight against the pandemic while putting patients at risk. Using a stochastic compartmental model, we simulate the spread of SARS-CoV-2 in a multi-ward hospital, assessing the effect of different scenarios and infection control strategies. The novelty of our method resides in the consideration of staff sharing data to better reflect the field reality. Our results highlight the poor efficiency of implementing a screening area before hospital admission, while the setting up of an isolation ward dedicated to COVID-19 patients and the restriction of healthcare workers movements between wards significantly reduce epidemic spread.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.3%
2
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 3%
10.0%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 20%
6.2%
5
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.6%
7
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.5%
8
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.5%
9
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 36%
2.1%
10
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.9%
12
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.8%
13
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 33%
1.7%
14
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
15
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.2%
16
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
17
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
18
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.9%
19
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
20
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
21
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
22
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
23
Microbial Genomics
204 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
microLife
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
25
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
Swiss Medical Weekly
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
27
CMAJ Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%